Parallel-plate capacitor: Two dielectric materials

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a parallel-plate capacitor that has two different dielectric materials filling its gap. The left half is filled with a dielectric constant of K1 = 7.00, and the right half with K2 = 12.0. The task is to determine the capacitance of this configuration.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of the capacitor setup, questioning whether the two halves should be treated as capacitors in series or parallel. There are attempts to calculate individual capacitances for each half and confusion about combining them correctly.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct approach to combine the capacitances, suggesting that the two halves should be treated as being in parallel rather than in series. There is ongoing exploration of the reasoning behind this setup, with participants clarifying their understanding of the configuration.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a figure accompanying the problem that illustrates the division of the area into two halves, which may influence the calculations. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their assumptions regarding the treatment of the two halves of the capacitor.

phyzmatix
Messages
313
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Parallel-plate capacitor: Two dielectric materials

Homework Statement



A parallel-plate capacitor with area A = 5.56 cm^2 and separation d = 5.56 mm has the left half of the gap filled with material of dielectric constant K1 = 7.00 and the right half filled with material of dielectric constant K2 = 12.0. What is the capacitance?


Homework Equations



C = \frac{\kappa \epsilon_{0} A}{d}

\frac {1}{C_{tot}} = \frac {1}{C_{left}} + \frac {1}{C_{right}}

The Attempt at a Solution



Since it's one capacitor (two plates) and since the dielectric materials are next to each other (as opposed to stacked) I approached the problem as if the two halves of the capacitor were separate parallel capacitors and calculated:

C_{left} = 3.10 pF
C_{right} = 5.31 pF

C_{tot} = 1.96 pF

But this is not amongst the given possible answers. Where did I go wrong?

Cheers

phyz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a serial connection of capacitors so you must add right and left halves capacity:
C=C_{right}+C_{left}
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your reply...however, could you please explain why this setup acts as capacitors in series?
 
I apologize to bad equation C=C_{1}+C_{2}
It's wrong... You have a good solution, because
V=\frac{q}{C}
and V_{1}=\frac{q}{C_{1}} V_{2}=\frac{q}{C_{2}}
and V=V_{1}+V_{2}
so \frac{1}{C}=\frac{1}{C_{1}}+\frac{1}{C_{2}}
 
But this is not amongst the given possible answers.

I appreciate your attempt at helping me Phizyk, but unfortunately we're no closer to understanding this problem than before...
 
phyzmatix said:
C_{left} = 3.10 pF
C_{right} = 5.31 pF

Hi phyzmatix! :smile:

Thanks for the PM …

Did you divide by 2 instead of multiply?
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi phyzmatix! :smile:

Thanks for the PM …

Did you divide by 2 instead of multiply?

Thanks for joining me here tiny-tim :smile:

Yes, I divided the total area given by 2 (I wish I had the means to show you the figure given with the question, on the figure they show that the left side is A/2 and the right side is also A/2)

So my understanding is that the left half of the parallel-plate capacitor has capacitance C_{left} (calculated with K1 and A/2) and the right half has capacitance C_{right} (calculated with K2 and A/2) but how to combine the two values into C_{tot}?

(I'm not sure my assumption that the two can be treated as separate parallel capacitors is correct)
 
Hi phyzmatix! :smile:

Well, they're side-by-side, not one-after-the-other, so they're "in parallel" rather than "in series" (plus, the question calls it a parallel-plate capacitor), so I think you just add them.

Isn't 8.41 one of the given answers?

(if not, what are the given answers? :wink:)
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi phyzmatix! :smile:

Well, they're side-by-side, not one-after-the-other, so they're "in parallel" rather than "in series" (plus, the question calls it a parallel-plate capacitor), so I think you just add them.

Isn't 8.41 one of the given answers?

(if not, what are the given answers? :wink:)

*DOH!*

I feel like such a tw@t :redface:

No wonder I didn't get the right answer, I was using the equation for capacitors in series...

*banging head against wall*

Cheers Tim! You legend! :biggrin:

(oh, by the by, 8.41 is indeed amongst the possibilities :wink:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
968
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K