Parallel plate capcitor displacement current magnitude

neu
Messages
228
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



Use an integral form of the Gauss law to show how the magnitude of D inside the capacitor depends on the charge on the plates of a parallel plate capacitor and their area.

Homework Equations



Gauss
\int{E.nda}=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}}

\nabla.D=\rho

where div, D, E all vectors


The Attempt at a Solution



so \epsilon\int{D.nda}=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}}

where integrals are all closed loops.

so integral over area = 2 pi r^2 : D.2.\pi.r^2=\epsilon_{r}\rho

that right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, let's get the definition straightened out

\int \vec{D} \bullet d\vec{a} = Q_{f,enc}

So the (closed) surface integral of D depends only on the free charge enclosed by the volume that is bounded by this surface.

I don't understand your last question, but before we get to that, I'll try to explain:

Now, in the region between the plates, you have no free charge: there is bound charge (induced charge) on the dielectric surfaces facing the conducting capacitor plates, but that's all.

Don't write something like D = \epsilon E right away. Work out the expression for D in the different regions and then get E.

I can argue by symmetry that D inside is normal to the capacitor plates (neglecting fringing) at all points. Further, D is zero inside the conductor (as P and E are both zero inside a conductor and D = \epsilon_{0} E + P). Now, if \sigma is the free surface charge density (=Q/A where A is the plate area and Q is the charge on the capacitor plate), then can you show that D = \sigma everywhere?

Once you have D, you can easily get E.

Now to your last equation. If you want to use the integral form of Gauss's Law with E (rather than D) then please understand that the charge you write on the right hand side is the sum of the bound charge (the induced charge in the dielectric..whatever part of it that contributes to the flux through your chosen Gaussians surface) and the free charge (capacitor charge). So you have to be careful to include the bound charge in this expression as well.

Generally, since we control free charge (you charge the capacitor) and bound charge readjusts along the way to satisfy boundary conditions in local regions, its easier to work out D first and then E.

While this post might not have solved your problem completely, I hope you can take it from here with the hints given. But please feel free to reply back esp if you are stuck or want to discuss this further. Include your solution with your reasoning so we can see where the problem is.

Best wishes
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top