Particle in a central potential and a magnetic field: nearly circular orbits

atat1tata
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle of mass m and charge e moves in a central field with potential V(r) = -\alpha r^{-3/2} and in a constant magnetic field \vec{B} = B_0 \hat{e}_z

1) Write the Lagrangian and the Hamiltonian

2) Write the first integral H_{orb} for the equation of the orbit u(\phi ) ("u" refers to the inverse of the radius of the orbit), then calculate the radius r_c for the stable circular orbit

3) For nearly circular orbit the equation of the orbit is r = \frac{r_c}{1 + \epsilon \cos (\omega\phi)}. Determine \omega and \epsilon for nearly circular orbits

Homework Equations



The equation my professor uses for the generalized potential generated by a magnetic field: 1/2 \vec{B}\cdot\vec{r}\times\vec{B}

The Attempt at a Solution



1) I think I solved for the Lagrangian and the Hamiltonian. I'm using polar coordinates:
L = 1/2m(\dot{r}^2 + r^2\dot{\phi}^2 + \alpha r^{-3/2} + 1/2 e B_0 r^2\dot{\phi}

H = \frac{p_r^2}{m} -\alpha r^{-3/2} + \frac{1}{2mr^2} (p_\phi - 1/2 e B_0 r^2)^2

I had the impression that the equation my professor gave me for the magnetic generalized potential (1/2 \vec{B}\cdot\vec{r}\times\vec{B}) had its sign wrong, so I changed its sign. Am I correct?

2) Here the problems begin. I attempted splitting the Hamiltonian into a "kinetic part" and an effective potential (V_{eff}(r) = -\alpha r^{-3/2} + \frac{1}{2mr^2} (p_\phi - 1/2 e B_0 r^2)^2), then I tried to express the kinetic part as a function of \frac{du}{d\phi} with several changes of variables. I ended up with H = \frac{(p_{\phi}-1/2 e B_0/u^2)^2}{m}\frac{du}{d\phi} + V_{eff}(1/u). Something, however goes wrong, since i found a dependence on "u" (= 1/r) in the "kinetic energy part" of the Hamiltonian. I'm basically stuck here. I know that I should find the minima of the effective potential in order to find the circular orbits, but I find a very difficult equation to solve, so I'm asking if I am following the right path

3) For this question I thought to set up V_{eff}(1/u_c) = \frac{(p_{\phi}-1/2 e B_0/u^2)^2}{m}\frac{du}{d\phi} + V_{eff}(1/u_c) + 1/2 V''_{eff} (1/u - 1/u_c) and then to try to solve it with separation of variables. For now I have not found u_c so I don't know if it will work, so I am asking for confirmation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
or for a different approach.I apologize for the long post and for my poor English. I hope you can understand. Any help is much appreciated!A:1) The sign of the potential is correct.2) In order to find the radius of the circular orbit, you need to solve $\frac{dV_{eff}(r)}{dr}=0$, but you should use the equation for $V_{eff}(r)$ that you wrote in the attempt section.3) You should use the first integral to find the equation of the orbit. Then you can separate variables and the solution will be something like $r=\frac{r_c}{1+\epsilon \cos(\omega \phi)}$. The value of $\omega$ will be given by the first integral, while the value of $\epsilon$ will be determined by the initial conditions of the particle.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top