Particle traveling towards a plate with an Electric Field

AI Thread Summary
A proton is projected towards a positively charged plate with a specific charge density, raising questions about whether it will reach the plate and, if not, how far it will turn around. To determine this, the electric field generated by the plate must be calculated, which involves integrating over the surface charge. There is uncertainty regarding the setup of the integration variables, such as dA, r, and the direction of the electric field. It is suggested to consider using electric potential instead of directly calculating the electric field for simplification. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding kinematics and forces acting on the proton to solve the problem effectively.
doggydan42
Messages
169
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


From a distance of 10 cm, a proton is projected with a speed of ##v = 4.0 × 106 \frac{m}{s}## directly at a large, positively charged plate whose charge density is ##\sigma = 2.0 × 10^{-5} \frac{C}{m^2}##. (See below.) (a) Does the proton reach the plate? (b) If not, how far from the plate does it
turn around?

Homework Equations


$$\vec E = \frac{1}{4\pi \varepsilon_0} \int_{Surface} \frac{\sigma}{r^2} \,dA \hat r$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand that once you find the electric field, you can multiply by the charge to find the force, than set that equal to ##m\vec a## and solve for a knowing the mass of the proton. Then use kinematics to find how far it will travel.

Though to find the electric field, I am unsure of how to set ##dA##, ## \hat r##, and ##r##. I am also unsure of what to integrate over.

Thank you in advance.
 

Attachments

  • CNX_UPhysics_22_05_Prob19_img.jpg
    CNX_UPhysics_22_05_Prob19_img.jpg
    6.6 KB · Views: 546
Physics news on Phys.org
I strongly suggest using the potential instead of the field.

You need to integrate over the surface charge - or you can use symmetry arguments.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top