Path of the particle on inclined plane

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle on an inclined plane, analyzing the forces acting on it, particularly in the context of static equilibrium and the effects of tension in a string. Participants explore the relationship between the angle of inclination, friction, and the motion of the particle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the particle, including tension, friction, and gravitational components. There are questions about the correct interpretation of angles involved and the conditions under which the particle remains stationary or begins to move.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various interpretations of the forces and angles involved. Some have provided equations to describe the motion, while others question the assumptions made regarding static equilibrium and the direction of friction. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is constrained by the condition that the angle of inclination is set such that tanθ = μ, and there is ongoing debate about the implications of this condition on the particle's motion and the role of friction.

  • #31
Vibhor said:
Do you think the attached picture correctly represents the forces acting on the particle in second quadrant ?
No. There is no way for those forces, as drawn, to add up to zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
TSny said:
No. There is not way for those forces, as drawn, to add up to zero.

Are you sure ?
 
  • #33
Vibhor said:
Are you sure ?
Pretty sure. Remember, ##f = W##. Does ##\vec{f} + \vec{W}## in your picure have a positive y component or negative y component?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
  • #34
Does this look correct ?
 

Attachments

  • second.PNG
    second.PNG
    447 bytes · Views: 373
  • #35
The forces must add to zero at all times. Is this possible in your diagram? Can the y-components of the forces balance to zero in your picture?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
  • #36
I understand what you are saying but , direction of ##\vec{f}## has to be in opposite direction to that of the resultant vector of ##\vec{T} + \vec{W}## . I need to first make ##\vec{W}## and ##\vec{T}## and then draw ##\vec{f}## such that it acts opposite to the resultant of the other two vectors .

If f = W , then forces cannot add to zero in second quadrant .
 
  • #37
Interesting to note that since it is the resultant of the two driving forces that is trying to overcome friction enough to cause motion and that the resultant has different values according to where the particle is on the plane then the particle could depending on location be stopped , accelerating or moving at constant velocity .

To establish slow stable motion in all locations the source of the string tension would have to have intelligence and vary the tension value according to particle location .
 
Last edited:
  • #38
Vibhor said:
If f = W , then forces cannot add to zero in second quadrant .
There is one situation where they can add to zero. What would T need to be?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
  • #39
TSny said:
There is one situation where they can add to zero. What would T need to be?

T needs to be zero .
 
  • #40
Right. So, if the slightest tension is applied to the string, what will happen?
 
  • #41
The particle will move radially inwards towards the hole .
 
  • #42
Vibhor said:
The particle will move radially inwards towards the hole .
In the first second quadrant an infinitesimal amount of tension will set the particle in motion. If the tension is kept essentially at zero as the particle moves at a slow constant speed in the first second quadrant, what direction does the kinetic friction need to act so that the net force is zero? If you know the direction of the kinetic friction, what can you say about the direction of the motion?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
  • #43
TSny said:
In the first quadrant an infinitesimal amount of tension will set the particle in motion.

The particle starts its motion in first or second quadrant ??
 
  • #44
Sorry again! We're talking second quadrant!
 
  • #45
TSny said:
In the first second quadrant an infinitesimal amount of tension will set the particle in motion. If the tension is kept essentially at zero as the particle moves at a slow constant speed in the first second quadrant, what direction does the kinetic friction need to act so that the net force is zero?

In +y direction .

TSny said:
If you know the direction of the kinetic friction, what can you say about the direction of the motion?

In -y direction i.e down the slope .
 
  • #46
Yes.
 
  • #47
But it cannot move down the slope , as the string holds it up . It has to move in +x direction as well . Is it making circular motion in second quadrant ??
 
  • #48
If I'm working it correctly, it does not move in a circle in the second quadrant. The string does not need to hold it up. It can slide down the slope while you take up slack in the string with T = 0.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
  • #49
In the question it states " The string is pulled so slowly " . Doesn't it mean the length of the string on the plane decreases continuously ( distance between hole and particle decreases ) ? If it is allowed to slide down the slope exclusively in -y direction , it is possible only if length of the string from the hole to the particle increases :rolleyes:
 
  • #50
What happens to distance between the particle and the hole as it slides down in the second quadrant?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
  • #51
Sorry.I was thinking about third quadrant . So the particle moves in a straight line with constant speed down the slope in the second quadrant ??
 
  • #52
I think so. The speed can be as slow as you want.
 
  • #53
Ok . Now when the particle enters third quadrant , tension is non zero ,which means the forces cannot add up to zero .Or can they ?
 
  • #54
Start with the particle sitting at rest at some point in the third quadrant with T = 0. Think about what happens as you slowly add tension to the string. Can you still have static equilibrium conditions for a finite amount of tension?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
  • #55
TSny said:
Start with the particle sitting at rest at some point in the third quadrant with T = 0. Think about what happens as you slowly add tension to the string. Can you still have static equilibrium conditions for a finite amount of tension?
As tension increases , the particle moves in +x as well as -y direction . Not sure whether we can definitely say it is a circular motion . For a finite amount of tension , the particle cannot be in static equilibrium.
 
  • #56
As tension is applied, the friction force can change direction in an attempt to keep the particle in equilibrium.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
  • #57
Sure . But its magnitude will always be less than the resultant of the other two forces . The particle cannot be in static equilibrium .
 
  • #58
Vibhor said:
Sure . But its magnitude will always be less than the resultant of the other two forces . The particle cannot be in static equilibrium .
I don't think that's true. It's easy to draw a force diagram for an arbitrary location in the 3rd quadrant where the three forces give equilibrium and T ≠ 0.

Actually, I think your equations in #15 [EDIT: #22] pretty much correspond to this situation. However, I think that it might be more convenient to let ##\phi## be the angle between the string and the negative y-axis for this quadrant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
  • #59
TSny said:
I don't think that's true. It's easy to draw a force diagram for an arbitrary location in the 3rd quadrant where the three forces give equilibrium and T ≠ 0.
:doh:.You are right. Can I say path traversed would be circular .
Actually, I think your equations in #15 [EDIT: #22] pretty much correspond to this situation. However, I think that it might be more convenient to let ##\phi## be the angle between the string and the negative y-axis for this quadrant.
How can I find the path equation ? Equations in #22 do not yield anything useful.
 
  • #60
Vibhor said:
:doh:.You are right. Can I say path traversed would be circular .
You'll need to find out.
How can I find the path equation ? Equations in #22 do not yield anything useful.
OK, you don't really need these equations. Just the picture you used to set up the equations. The important thing is to find the direction of the friction force just before slipping. If ##\phi## is the angle that the string makes to the (negative) y-axis, try to find the angle between the string and the friction force in terms of ##\phi##. Also think about which way the particle is going to move when it slips.

Edit: For clarity, I added a picture below to show ##\phi##.
 

Attachments

  • particle on slope.png
    particle on slope.png
    2 KB · Views: 405
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K