PDE with constant coefficient using orthogonal transformation

sara_math
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Plz Help :(

Hi

I want 2 know how 2 solve 1st order partial differintial equation (PDE) with constant coefficient using orthogonal transformation

example :
solve: 2Ux + 2Uy + Uz = 0

THnx :blushing:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would tackle this one geometrcially. You can express the left side of your PDE in terms of a directional derivative, as follows:

D_{\vec{v}}u=0
\vec{v}\cdot\vec{\nabla}u=0

Now let me ask you something:

Can you identify \vec{v}? Can you figure out the lines along which u is constant?
 
Thnx sir

but the dr. who teach me, didn't use this way with us

when we have aUx+bUy+cU=f , where a,b,c,f are constants
he take tan(r)=b/a
then he find r
after that take w=xcosr+ysinr , t=-xsinr+ycosr
then find Ux , Uy
that's it

so if i have aUx+bUy+cUz+dU=f
can i take same w, t and z=z ?
 
My approach is not much different from your professor's.

This equation:

aUx+bUy+cU=f , where a,b,c,f are constants

can be written in the following form.

D_{\vec{v}}u+cu=f

where \vec{v}=<a,b>.

he take tan(r)=b/a
then he find r
after that take w=xcosr+ysinr , t=-xsinr+ycosr
then find Ux , Uy

What your instructor did was rotate the x-axis so that it coincides with the vector \vec{v}. In that coordinate system there is only one independent variable, and so you effectively have an ODE. The rotation matrix that carries \{x,y\} into \{w,t\} is given by the following.

R_{z}(r) = \left[\begin{array}{cc} \cos(r) & \sin(r)\\ -\sin(r) & \cos(r) \end{array}\right]

that's it

No, that's not it. All that does is transform the equation. It still remains to solve it.

so if i have aUx+bUy+cUz+dU=f
can i take same w, t and z=z ?

You will want to do a rotation about some axis so that one coordinate axis is parallel to \vec{v}=<a,b,c>.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
981
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top