Pendulum max gravity acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the ratio of maximum acceleration of a pendulum to gravitational acceleration, expressed in terms of the pendulum's length, L. Participants express confusion regarding whether the question pertains to maximum angular acceleration or linear acceleration, noting that clarity is lacking. It is suggested that the question likely seeks the ratio of angular acceleration, but this still depends on the amplitude of the pendulum's swing. The ambiguity in the phrasing of "ratio between" further complicates the interpretation, as it is unclear which acceleration should be divided by the other. Ultimately, one participant proposes that the ratio may be 1/L, which seems the most plausible conclusion.
terryds
Messages
392
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



What is the ratio between maximum acceleration of pendulum oscillation and the gravity acceleration ?
Express the answer in terms of L (the length of pendulum string)

Homework Equations


SHM

The Attempt at a Solution



amax = ω2 A = (g/l) L sin θ = g sin θ

So, the ratio is sin θ..
But, how to express sin θ in terms of L?
I know that for small angles, sin θ can be approximated to θ, and θ is arc length/L... Still, it's confusing
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question strikes me as ambiguous. Does it mean the maximum angular acceleration, ##\ddot \theta##, or the maximum linear tangential acceleration, ##L\ddot \theta##?
If we take it as linear, dimensional analysis shows the question is unanswerable. A ratio of two accelerations is dimensionless, so cannot be derived from a single distance. At least two distances would be required.
If we take it as angular, we still don't get any further since, as you found, it depends on the amplitude.

Another possibility is total linear acceleration, which means centripetal acceleration needs to be considered.
 
haruspex said:
The question strikes me as ambiguous. Does it mean the maximum angular acceleration, ##\ddot \theta##, or the maximum linear tangential acceleration, ##L\ddot \theta##?
If we take it as linear, dimensional analysis shows the question is unanswerable. A ratio of two accelerations is dimensionless, so cannot be derived from a single distance. At least two distances would be required.
If we take it as angular, we still don't get any further since, as you found, it depends on the amplitude.

Another possibility is total linear acceleration, which means centripetal acceleration needs to be considered.

The options are

A. 2L
B. √L
C. √(1/L)
D. L
E. 1/L

Which one is correct... please help
 
terryds said:
The options are

A. 2L
B. √L
C. √(1/L)
D. L
E. 1/L

Which one is correct... please help
I would say this establishes that what they are after is angular acceleration, ##\ddot \theta##, not linear acceleration. We still have the problem that the correct answer involves the amplitude, but maybe the question intended to ask only how the ratio depends on L, rather than an exact ratio between the two accelerations, so just treat it as though the amplitude is 1.
But there is a second difficulty. The "ratio between" does not specify which is to be divided by the other. Is a ratio of 1:L an answer of L or 1/L?
 
  • Like
Likes terryds
haruspex said:
I would say this establishes that what they are after is angular acceleration, ##\ddot \theta##, not linear acceleration. We still have the problem that the correct answer involves the amplitude, but maybe the question intended to ask only how the ratio depends on L, rather than an exact ratio between the two accelerations, so just treat it as though the amplitude is 1.
But there is a second difficulty. The "ratio between" does not specify which is to be divided by the other. Is a ratio of 1:L an answer of L or 1/L?

It means the division of max pendulum acceleration by the gravitational acceleration. Maybe it's 1/L
 
terryds said:
It means the division of max pendulum acceleration by the gravitational acceleration. Maybe it's 1/L
That looks the most likely.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top