Penetration of an energy step when KE > U

OEP
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An electron with KE = 8eV is incident on the potential step of height 7eV. What's the probability the electron will be reflected from the step function?


Homework Equations


The wave equations and their derivatives:

\psi_0(x) = A sin(k_0 x) + B cos( k_0 x)
\psi_1(x) = C sin(k_1 x) + D cos( k_1 x)
\psi_0'(x) = A k_0 cos(k_0 x) - B k_0 sin(k_0 x)
\psi_1'(x) = C k_1 cos(k_1 x) - D k_1 sin(k_1 x)

Plus values for k:

k_0 = \sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2} (7eV)}
k_1 = \sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2} (1eV)}

The Attempt at a Solution


First I solved the two wave functions evaluated at 0, which yields:
B = D

Next, I solved the two derivatives evaluated at 0, which yields:
A k_0 = C k_1 \rightarrow C = \sqrt{7} A

From here I'm lost.

I also did the same thing with complex exponentials... but I think I ended up with a nonsensical k_0 = sqrt(7) k_0.

\psi_0(x) = A' e^{i k_0 x} + B' e^{-i k_0 x}
\psi_1(x) = C' e^{i k_1 x} + D' e^{-i k_1 x}

\psi_0'(x) = i k_0 A' e^{i k_0 x} + i k_0 B' e^{-i k_0 x}
\psi_1'(x) = i k_1 C' e^{i k_1 x} + i k_1 D' e^{-i k_1 x}

D' = 0, we are firing particles from right to left, not left to right.

\psi_0'(0) = \psi_1'(0) \rightarrow i k_0 A' + i k_0 B' = i k_1 C'
\psi_0(0) = \psi_1(0) \rightarrow A' + B' = C'

i k_0 A' + i k_0 B' = i k_1 C' \rightarrow i k_0 A' + i k_0 B' = i k_1 (A' + B')
i k_0 = i k_1

Which is nonsensical. Any ideas? This seems like one of those good ol' problems that you first learn to solve, but... our professor is just a bit zany and I can't follow him. :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I prefer the exponential notation as it is clear what is moving right & left

you have missed a negative in you differentiation

should get
A + B = C

and
k0(A-B) = k1C

then solve these for reflection amplitude is r = A/B, probability r^2
 
Thanks a lot! I guess it's being so over my head that I tend to overlook the smaller things... I have R being at 2.64 which I don't think is right for its square being a probability. We aren't looking for B / A are we?
 
i know what you mean -

& yep, you're right B/A should do it
 
Thanks again. I'm off to trudge through the rain and turn this sucker in.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top