Percent correction for Magnetic Field vs. Electric Field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the percent correction for the electric field when considering the effects of gravity on an electron's motion. Participants emphasize the need to define "percent correction" to understand what is being corrected and why. A free-body diagram is suggested to visualize the forces acting on the electron, including gravity. The equations presented show how to incorporate gravity into the voltage calculation, leading to a modified voltage equation. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing systematic errors when determining magnetic field strength.
michaelle1991
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,
In the photo is the problem. We set Fb =Fe to show for E then out E into the Voltage equation to get V=vlB. However, if we won;t ignore the gravity force, what is the percent correction? (Note: q =Electron)
 

Attachments

  • photo.jpg
    photo.jpg
    43.2 KB · Views: 499
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
What is the definition of "percent correction" - that will tell you how to work it out.
In the presence of gravity - draw a free-body diagram for the electron.
 
i did a little work, but idk if it is right?
 

Attachments

  • photo (1).jpg
    photo (1).jpg
    38.6 KB · Views: 522
You missed out defining what "percentage correction" means.
What are you correcting and why?

The fbd and calculation seems OK.

qvlB = qV + mgl

So V= vlB-gl(m/q) with gravity

Without gravity: V0=vlB

If you used B=V0/vl with V0=V then you have introduced a systematic error into your equation for determining B.
 
michaelle1991 said:
Hi guys,
In the photo is the problem. We set Fb =Fe to show for E then out E into the Voltage equation to get V=vlB. However, if we won;t ignore the gravity force, what is the percent correction? (Note: q =Electron)

Please check your PMs...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top