Perfect fluids and the stress energy tensor

black_hole
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Texbooks that describe perfect fluids are often a little unclear about what is being assumed. It may not be immediately obvious why can't the pressures be different in different directions? Let's examine this. Suppose Tαβ = diag(ρ,(1+ε)P,P,P) . Show that if one performs a rotation around the z axis by an angle phi that the stress energy tensor picks up off diagonal components of order εP."

What rotation matrix should I be using, it's coordinate dependent isn't it?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
black_hole said:

Homework Statement



"Texbooks that describe perfect fluids are often a little unclear about what is being assumed. it may not be immediately obvious why can't the pressures be different in different directions? Let's examine this. Suppose Tαβ = diag(ρ,(1+ε)P,P,P) . Show that if one performs a rotation around the z axis by an angle phi that the stress energy tensor picks up off diagonal components of order εP."

What rotation matrix should I be using, it's coordinate dependent isn't it?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Since they say rotation about the z axis by an angle phi, I think you can assume the spatial coordinates are cartesian. Just work with those.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top