Period of Oscillations near equator

AI Thread Summary
A bead on a frictionless wire at the equator oscillates when displaced due to the effective gravitational force not pointing directly towards the Earth's center. The discussion highlights the need to consider the centrifugal force, which acts to pull the bead back towards the equator, leading to oscillatory motion similar to a mass-spring system. Participants debate the correct approach to derive the period of oscillation, suggesting the use of equations of motion and the net forces acting on the bead. A diagram illustrating the forces in the north-south and vertical planes is recommended for clarity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of analyzing all forces, including fictitious ones, in the system.
Decadohedron
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A bead slides along a frictionless wire which lies in the N/S direction, midpoint at the equator. All points along the wire are the same distance from the center of the earth. The bead is initially at rest then released a small distance, δ, to the north of the equator. Because of effective g doesn't point directly towards the Earth's center, there is a small component along the wire that always points back towards the equator. This means that when released, the bead will oscillate back and forth just like a mass on a spring. What is the period of these oscillations?

Homework Equations


Coriolis force would be 0 as the bead is fixed on a wire, and the centrifugal force would be the force always pointing it back towards the equator - thus the formula being

1.
-GMm/r2 + mω2r = 0

2.
T = 2π√(m/k); ω2=m/k

The Attempt at a Solution



I was going to solve for ω and then just plug into the Period formula of the mass-spring system. But it seems overly simple and feels like I'm missing something.

Am I on the right track or should I be thinking about this differently??

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Decadohedron said:
-GMm/r2 + mω2r = 0
It isn't in orbit.
 
haruspex said:
It isn't in orbit.

So I should be using mr'' = -GMm/r2 + mω2r instead and solve the PDE and go from there?
 
Decadohedron said:
So I should be using mr'' = -GMm/r2 + mω2r instead and solve the PDE and go from there?
What about the forces from the wire?
 
haruspex said:
What about the forces from the wire?

There would be the parallel component in the r direction mω2rcos2(Φ) + the perpendicular component mω2rsin(Φ)cos(Φ)
 
Decadohedron said:
There would be the parallel component in the r direction mω2rcos2(Φ) + the perpendicular component mω2rsin(Φ)cos(Φ)
You don't need to calculate the forces from the wire, just take them into account in your analysis.

Draw a diagram in the NS, up-down plane showing the bead at latitude Φ. What forces act (centrifugal being a fictitious force)? What is the net force?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top