Periodic Motion: Explaining Resolving into Oscillatory Components

AI Thread Summary
Every periodic motion can be resolved into simple oscillatory components using Fourier Series, which allows for the decomposition of complex periodic functions into sums of sine and cosine functions. This mathematical approach enables the analysis of various periodic motions, including the Earth's motion, by deriving equations for the forces involved. By applying Fourier analysis, one can express the periodicity of the Earth's motion as an infinite sum of these basic functions. Simple examples of periodic motion include pendulums and springs, while planetary motion follows Kepler's laws. Understanding these concepts is essential for analyzing periodic phenomena in physics.
PrincePhoenix
Gold Member
Messages
116
Reaction score
2
According to our textbook "..every periodic motion, however complicated it may be, can always be resolved into simple oscillatory components." Can someone explain this? How can the periodic motion of Earth be resolved into oscillatory components?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey PrincePhoenix,

I believe what your textbook is referring to is the idea of a Fourier Series. The mathematician and physicist derived a method with which it is possible to decompose any periodic function to a sum of basic periodic functions, namely sines and cosines. By manipulating the amplitudes of several (often infinite) sines and cosines, it is possible to construct the desired function.

To learn more about the actual computation of the series, just search the web for Fourier series and harmonic analysis.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FourierSeries.htmlAs far as the periodic motion of the Earth goes, if you can come up with a clean equation for the forces acting on it, it is possible to derive the periodicity of the Earth's motion. Using Fourier, I assume you would be able to decompose this into a form of an infinite sum of sines and cosines.

Hope this helps a bit!
 
Thanks.
 
Simple periodic motion is usually described as being like the motion of a pendulum in a gravitational field, or Hookes Law for a spring
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pendulum
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hooke's_law
where the restoring force is (nearly) proportional to the displacement from the center.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hooke's_law
But the planetary motion around the Sun is also periodic, and is described by Kepler's laws.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler's_laws_of_planetary_motion

Bob S
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top