Perturbation with equations of motion for air resistance

hb1547
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"A ball is tossed upwards with speed V_0. Air resistance is -mkv^2 and there's gravity too.

Find the the time it takes the ball to reach the maximum height. Do not solve the equation of motion exactly. Use the perturbation method on the equation of motion. Solve the equation of motion without the air resistance. Then include the air resistance term, but plug in the first solution to the air resistance term. Find the leading order correction to x.

Homework Equations


F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


It's unclear what is meant by 'solve' the E.O.M. I assume that meant find v(t).
Without air resistance, that was quick: v = -gt + v_o. Then I added the air resistance term (and canceled mass):
a = -g -kv^2
Plugging in the above into that for v didn't seem to suggest anything -- in fact after integrating I got an upward parabola which doesn't seem to make sense.

I think the perturbation parameter might be \frac{kv_o^2}{g} since that's unitless.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Never heard of 'perturbation parameter'. But the diff. eq. is easy to solve.

Your equation for a is wrong. g and v^2 oppose each other (unless you considered g < 0)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top