Phase cells and equilibrium speed distribution

michelle001
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the probability of any given molecule occupying any given phase cell is known, what additional information is required in order to work out the equilibrium distribution of molecular speeds in a pure gas?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


Since the phase cells describe the position and velocity of each molecule - the speed of every molecule can be determined so long as the atomic mass is know. Since we know all phase cells we know number of molecules and the probability of each and can find the spread of speeds. So the only additional information required from that supplied in the question is the atomic mass of the molecule

I can't actually find any information to support this but having tried to figure it out and reread books for last two hours I thought I'd try my first post! can anyone help me??

or having had another think am I supposed to use f(v)=Bv^2 . e^(-mv^2/2kT) in which case I'd need the absolute temperature and atomic mass of neon?

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Michelle
I'm not an expert, but I think we're doing the same course.

If you look at the equation that you stated for the speed distribution function f(v), you need to work out what the different parts of it relate to. e^-mv^2/2kT corresponds to the probability of a molecule being found in a given phase cell, so have a think about what other items of information are needed to find f(v).
Hope that helps
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top