Phonons driven at high frequency

jurybrown
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For one-dimensional monatomic crystals, the dispersion plot for phonons has a maximum frequency ωmax. If a driving force oscillates the crystal beyond this frequency, the phonon will no longer propagate and will instead decay as it gets further from the external source of oscillation. Obtain an expression for k (the wave number) using a decaying function rather than an oscillating one.

Homework Equations


Original "oscillatory" solution of form Aei(ksa-ωt) where s indexes the atoms of the crystal and a is the spacing between crystals. The equation of motion is given by d2us/dt2 = C (us+1+us-1-2us) where us is the displacement of the sth atom from equillbrium and C is the constant of interaction between atoms.

The Attempt at a Solution


I can tack on an e-γsa to the oscillatory solution but the result of substituting that in the equation of motion above does not look like it can be solved for 'k'. Subsequent questions suggest that a closed-form solution is what is being asked for. I also considered a solution that simply decayed (vs decaying a sinusoidal function) just of the form e-γsa but I am not sure how k would fit into such a solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top