How Is Maximum Kinetic Energy Calculated in the Photoelectric Effect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mss90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electric Photo
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the maximum kinetic energy (Ek) of ejected electrons in the photoelectric effect, the equation Ek = (hc/lambda) - W is used, where W is the work function. A magnesium surface with a work function of 3.68 eV is struck by electromagnetic waves with a wavelength of 215 nm. A user initially miscalculated the energy, resulting in an incorrect value of -3.68*10^10 eV instead of the expected 2.10 eV. The error was identified as a mistake in converting the work function from eV to Joules. Correcting the calculation led to the accurate determination of the maximum kinetic energy.
mss90
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A magnesium surface has a work.func of 3.68eV. El.mag. waves with wavelenght of 215nm strike the surface and eject electrons. Find the max Ek of the ejected electrons in eV.

Homework Equations


E=Ek-W <=> Ek=(hc/lambda) - W

The Attempt at a Solution


I convert eV to J and nm to m but i get -3.68*10^10eV, but the answer is suppoused to be 2.10eV.
I even re did it but got the same answer, where em I going wrong?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.
In order to see where you are going wrong, we need to see your entire calculation.
 
Ek=(hc/lambda)-W

((6.63*10^-34)*(3*10^8))/(2.15*10^-7) - (5.888*10^-9)

(9.25*10^-19) - ( (5.888*10^-9) = -5.887*10^-9 J / (1.6*10^-19) = -3.68*10^10eV
 
mss90 said:
Ek=(hc/lambda)-W

((6.63*10^-34)*(3*10^8))/(2.15*10^-7) - (5.888*10^-9)

(9.25*10^-19) - ( (5.888*10^-9) = -5.887*10^-9 J / (1.6*10^-19) = -3.68*10^10eV

Check the power of 10 for the work function expressed in Joules.
 
ah ye, there we go. thanks :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top