Physics: conservation of energy and springs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving two children using a spring-loaded gun to hit a target box with a marble. Bobby's attempt falls short, prompting the need to determine how much Rhonda should compress the spring for a successful hit. Key concepts include the conservation of energy, where the potential energy stored in the spring is converted to kinetic energy of the marble, and the kinematic equations for projectile motion. The time of flight is constant due to the height from which the marble falls, meaning the horizontal distance traveled is directly related to the marble's horizontal speed. The conclusion emphasizes using conservation of energy and projectile motion equations to solve for the required spring compression.
InFiNiTeX
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Two children are playing a game in which they try to hit a small box on the floor with a marble fired from a spring-loaded gun that is mounted on a table. The target box is 2.20m horizontally from the edge of the table. Bobby compresses the spring 1.10cm, but the center of the marble falls 27.0cm short of the center of the box. How far should Rhonda compress the spring to score a direct hit? Assume that neither the spring nor the ball encounters friction in the gun.

i know i use conservation of energy and X=vt+(1/2)Axt^2 and Y=Voy(t)+(1/2)Ayt^2 and i think you solve for both... but after that i don't know what to do... am i using the right equations? the answer is 1.25cm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Realize that the time it takes for the marble to fall depends only on the height so is a constant. Thus the horizontal distance the marble travels is proportional to its horizontal speed. Now relate the horizontal speed to the amount of spring compression using conservation of energy: 1/2 k x^2 = 1/2 m v^2. Use ratios.
 
i do not really understand... i was told i would most probably use conservation of energy and the 2d motion equations.. is that the same as what you explained?
 
Realize that there are usually several ways--all equivalent--to solve these kinds of problem. I don't know what you mean by "2d motion equations"; I assume you mean the kinematic equations you wrote? If so, realize that only the vertical motion is accelerated; the horizontal speed remains constant.

Bottom line: Yes, use conservation of energy and kinematics of projectiles.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top