Physics of Roulette: Spin, Friction, Wind, Momentum, Bounce

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darrenmackenz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Darrenmackenz
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi guys I have a question.
What are the physics involved in roulette?

I know you have these:
-Spin or momentum of the roulette table
-Friction on the ball from the table
-wind resistance on the ball
-momentum of the ball
-And the bounce when the ball finally drops and hits a few groves

Anything I've missed?

I've placed this in number theory because I was also curious how the maths works.
I've been watching some online roulette and keep seeing certain numbers pop up, it looks like more than chance. Is it possible that the ball lands in some places more than others because the guy applying the momentum to the ball is consistent? Kinda like throwing pennies into a cup, if you do it long enough you become consistent due to muscle memory.

What do you guys think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is where you want to start your research.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eudaemons

Some physicists in the 70's figured out how to make a wearable roulette computer. You'd watch a roulette wheel for a while and input the results; and it would figure out the wheel's bias and tell you how to bet.

Fascinating story. It worked but of course they had some problems ... wearable electronics weren't exactly easy in the 70's, they had to invent everything they used. One team member was burned when a unit shorted out.
 
SteveL27 said:
This is where you want to start your research.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eudaemons

Some physicists in the 70's figured out how to make a wearable roulette computer. You'd watch a roulette wheel for a while and input the results; and it would figure out the wheel's bias and tell you how to bet.

Fascinating story. It worked but of course they had some problems ... wearable electronics weren't exactly easy in the 70's, they had to invent everything they used. One team member was burned when a unit shorted out.

Thanks, I think I've heard of the story. I know some guys did it recently with lasers, if you have a fixed point on the table and the ball breaks the laser you can work out its velocity, you then have to take into consideration wind resistance and the bounce.
But as you say each table has a bias, do you think its based on the guy spinning the ball or the actual mechanics of the table that produce the bias?
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top