Physics Project Help: Plotting Py vs Px vs Time and V1 Potential vs Time"

  • Thread starter Thread starter tinker99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Project
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics project requiring the plotting of py vs px vs time and v1 potential vs time using provided data. The user is confused about whether py and px are the same or if separate equations are needed, specifically questioning the use of w=theta/time for these variables. It is clarified that to derive px and py, one should use the equations Px = P*Cos(theta) and Py = P*Sin(theta). Additionally, there is a suggestion to utilize a spreadsheet for plotting the graphs. The user expresses uncertainty about the correct appearance of their graph, indicating a need for further clarification.
tinker99
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am supposed to use the data provided to plot py vs px vs time and use v1 px to plot v1 potential vs time.

Homework Equations


I am assuming I must use w=theta/time for py/px

and this is where I am stuck is py/px the same think, or is there a separate equation for those? or is it the provided P in the project?

The Attempt at a Solution


This project has me really confused at the moment so this post may not make a lot of sense. I have uploaded the project.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am supposed to use the data provided to plot py vs px vs time and use v1 px to plot v1 potential vs time.

If I've understood correctly it actually says to plot..

Py vs Px

The table gives values for theta and P which you can convert to components Px and Py. See the diagram to the right of the table.
 
So, to get to px and py, would I use an equation involving theta and P? Or how would I do that?
 
Yes. I would suggest ...

Px = P*Cos(theta)
Py = P*Sin(theta)

Try a spreadsheet?

PS: I'm not at all familiar with heart monitoring!
 
umm..does anybody know if my graph should look like this?

Sorry had the wrong graph. (it should not look like the graph in this photo)
 

Attachments

Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top