Physics question - object released at equillibrium position of spring

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a ball attached to a spring, where the ball is released from the equilibrium position. Two methods were attempted to determine how far the ball falls before being stopped by the spring. The first method equates the gravitational force to the spring force, while the second method uses the conservation of energy principle. The second method, which yields a result twice as large as the first, is ultimately identified as the correct approach. The confusion arises from a misunderstanding of when the forces are in equilibrium, highlighting the importance of correctly applying physics principles.
shadowysun
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

I am having a lot of trouble with the following question and would appreciate it if someone showed me the correct way to do it. Thanks in advance for your help! :)

Homework Statement


A 0.20 kg ball attached to a vertical spring (k = 28 N/M) is released from rest from the unstretched equilibrium position of the spring. Determine how far the ball falls, under negligible air resitance, before being brought to a momentary stop by the spring.

So,
m = 0.20 kg
k = 28 N/M
x = ?

Homework Equations


Fspring = kx
Fg = mg
EE = 1/2 kx^2
EG = mg (delta h)

The Attempt at a Solution


My friend and I both attempted to solve this problem. We used different methods and obtained different answers, but neither of us know which answer is right and why the other is wrong.

Here is the 1st way we did it:
When the ball is brought to a momentary stop, Fnet
= 0, so
Fg = Fspring
mg = kx
x = mg/k

And here is the 2nd way:
Since energy is conserved,
Ebefore
= Eafter

EG lost
= EE gained

mg(delta h) = 1/2 kx^2

delta h = x (since the ball falls the same distance that the spring stretches), therefore
mgx = 1/2 kx^2
x = 2mg/k

But this is twice as large as the solution obtained using the first method. Am I overlooking something in one of the methods? Which method is correct?

Again, thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shadowysun said:
Here is the 1st way we did it:
When the ball is brought to a momentary stop, Fnet[/size] = 0, so
Fnet = 0 means that the acceleration is zero, not the speed.
 
x = mg/k is true only during stretched equilibrium position of the spring. Therefore 2nd method is correct.
 
Omg. I can't believe I made such a dumb mistake >_<. Thank you so much for your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top