Placing charges with coulomb's law problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three charges: a charge +Q at the origin, a charge +4Q at a distance d on the x-axis, and a third charge q that needs to be placed in equilibrium with the other two charges. Participants are exploring the conditions under which all three charges can coexist without experiencing net force.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the placement and sign of the third charge, with initial thoughts suggesting it should be negative and positioned between the other two charges. Questions arise about the existence of a point on the x-axis where the electric field is zero and the forces exerted by the charges on each other.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on the implications of charge placement and the forces involved. There is ongoing exploration of the relationship between the charges and the conditions for equilibrium, with various interpretations being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the charge Q is equal to 1.6 x 10^(-19) and are considering the implications of this assumption on the calculations for the third charge.

kirby2
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Problem: a charge +Q is located at the origin and a second charge, +4Q is at a distance d on the x-axis. where should a third charge, q, be placed, and what should be its sign and magnitude, so that all three charges will be in equilibrium.

attempt:

I don't know how to solve it fully, but my initial thought is to put the third charge in between the other two and give it a negative sign. The two other charges repel each other so i thought a negative one in the middle would put them in equilibrium. is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kirby2 said:
Problem: a charge +Q is located at the origin and a second charge, +4Q is at a distance d on the x-axis. where should a third charge, q, be placed, and what should be its sign and magnitude, so that all three charges will be in equilibrium.

attempt:

I don't know how to solve it fully, but my initial thought is to put the third charge in between the other two and give it a negative sign. The two other charges repel each other so i thought a negative one in the middle would put them in equilibrium. is this right?
You are right about the sign of the third charge.

Considering, for a moment, only the positive charges:
1. Is there any location along the x-axis where the electric field is zero?

2. What is the magnitude of the force that the two positive charges exert on each other?​
Answering those should give you a good start.
 
am i correct by saying that there is no point on the x-axis where the electric field is zero
 
kirby2 said:
am i correct by saying that there is no point on the x-axis where the electric field is zero
No.

For any location between x = 0 and x = d, The direction of the electric field due to the +Q charge is in the opposite direction of the electric field due to the +4Q charge . Therefore, there is some location between x = 0 and x = d at which the electric field due to those two charges is zero. At that location, what is true of the magnitude of the field due to +Q compared to the magnitude of the field due to +4Q ?

In my experience, by the time you encounter a problem like the one in this thread, you would have already done some problems with two charges located on the x-axis and you are to find the location at which the electric field is zero.
.
 
Last edited:
i think i got it. it should be placed right d/3 from origin. sign negative. and charge of 7.11 x 10^(-20).
 
kirby2 said:
i think i got it. it should be placed right d/3 from origin. sign negative. and charge of 7.11 x 10^(-20).
That's the correct location.

You haven't given a specific value for the charge Q. How can you give a specific numerical value for the 3rd charge, q ?

Use the second hint I gave you.
 
i assumed Q to be 1.6 x 10^(-19)
 
kirby2 said:
i assumed Q to be 1.6 x 10^(-19)
Any reason for that assumption?

If you assume that, then the third charge, q, will be a fraction af one electron charge.
 
the force that the two charges exert on each other is (k)((4Q^2)/d^2). but i don't know how that helps
 
  • #10
kirby2 said:
the force that the two charges exert on each other is (k)((4Q^2)/d^2). but i don't know how that helps
That is a force of repulsion.

The middle charge, q, must exert a force equal to that. As you have concluded previously, charge, q, must have a sign opposite to that of Q & 4Q, so that it attracts both of them.

What is the (magnitude of the) force exerted on each other by the charge, Q, at the origin and the charge, q, at x = d/3 ?

Set that force equal to [itex]\displaystyle \frac{4k\,Q^2}{d^2}\,.[/itex]
 
  • #11
OK. i think its -3Q.
 
  • #12
kirby2 said:
OK. i think its -3Q.

Magnitude of the force between Q & 4Q:
[itex]\displaystyle \frac{4k\,Q^2}{d^2}\,.[/itex]​

Magnitude of the force between Q & q: assuming q is at x=d/3 and q = -3Q:
[itex]\displaystyle \frac{4k\,(3Q)\cdot Q}{(d/3)^2}=27\frac{4k\,(Q^2)}{d^2}\,.[/itex]​
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K