How Can Gaussian Elimination Demonstrate a Line of Intersection in 3D Space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Muzly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planes Vectors
AI Thread Summary
Gaussian elimination reveals that the system of linear equations has one free variable, indicating that the solutions form a line L in three-dimensional space. The parametric equations for this line are given as x = (8-7r)/3, y = (5r-1)/3, and z = r, confirming the line's existence. To express L in vector form, a proper parallel vector b can be determined by selecting two values for r, calculating the corresponding points, and finding the difference. The normal vectors for the planes are established, and the vector c, which lies along the intersection of planes P1 and P2, can be obtained through the cross product of their normal vectors. This vector c will indeed be parallel to vector b, as both represent the same line of intersection.
Muzly
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi, first poster here.

I'm stuck on a question in first-year University Maths. I'll put down what I know where I've done it.

Question: Consider these linear equations:

x + 2y - z = 2
2x + y + 3z = 5
x + 5y - 6z = 1

for the planes P1, P2 and P3 respectively.

(a) Using Gaussian elimination, show that there is one free variable, and that the solutions lie along a line L in three dimensions.

Obviously, I'm not going to put down the whole algorithm, but my solution set is as follows:
(S1,S2,S3) = ( (8-7r)/3 , (5r-1)/3 , r )
Where r is our free variable.
Any ideas on how to show (prove) that the equation lies along a line in three dimensions? Or will that be enough?

(b) Write the equation for L in vector form, and find a vector b parallel to the line L.

Would the equation for L in vector form just be [(8-7r)/3]i + [(5r-1)/3]j + rk?

Vector b is parallel to that if you just add a constant, correct?

(c) (The tricky one).
Write down normal vectors n1, n2, n3 for the planes P1, P2, P3 respectively. Obtain a vector c that lies along the line of intersection of P1 and P2, by using the vectors n1 and n2.

Is c parallel to the vector b in (b) above? Should it be?

I have got n1, n2 and n3 through finding the vector equation for P1, P2 and P3, and using cross-multiplication.
The vector forms are:
P1 - 2i + j - 2k
P2 - (2/5)i + (1/5)j + (3/5)k
P3 - i + (1/5)j - (1/6)k

Using X, Y and Z intercepts, and labelling each point A, B, and C respectively, I obtained the following vectors (I'll only show for normal vector for P1, too much to type here!)
A->B = (-2, 1, 0)
A->C = (-2, 0, -2)

Cross multiply these and you'll get:
n1 = 2i + 4j - 2k

Also,
n2 = (3/25)i + (6/25)j + (2/25)k
n3 = (-1/30)i - (1/6)j + (1/5)k

Is anyone able to just check my work (to make sure the response to my problem is correct), and able to explain to me clearly about how to obtain the vector c and if it should be parallel to vector b as in Part B.

All help is GREATLY appreciated! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not quite sure about this, but I think vector c should be the cross product of n1 and n2. I'm having a hard time imagining it in my mind, but I think if a vector is perpedicular to the perpendiculars of two planes, then it should lie parallel to the intersection of the two planes.
 
Exactly as I thought, but I thought I'd come on here for confirmation.

But, the vector c must lie along the line of intersection of P1 and P2. That's what's stumped me.

And it further asks if vector c (along the line of intersection of P1 and P2) is parallel to the vector b (parallel to the line of intersection of P1 P2 and P3), and should that be so.

If you could cross product n1 and n2 , I had a hint from a tutor that there should be a varying vector attached, which should just be the unit vector of the resultant vector of the cross product of n1 and n2 , with a t stuck outside it. (t is an element of all real numbers)
eg.
(Ai + Bj + Ck) + (Di + Ej + Fk)t
 
Muzly said:
(a) Using Gaussian elimination, show that there is one free variable, and that the solutions lie along a line L in three dimensions.

Obviously, I'm not going to put down the whole algorithm, but my solution set is as follows:
(S1,S2,S3) = ( (8-7r)/3 , (5r-1)/3 , r )
Where r is our free variable.
Any ideas on how to show (prove) that the equation lies along a line in three dimensions? Or will that be enough?
Looks good to me. The "line in three dimensions" referred to is given in parametric equations as x= (8-7r)/3, y= (5r-1)/, z= r. Clearly any point in the intersection lies on that line.

(b) Write the equation for L in vector form, and find a vector b parallel to the line L.

Would the equation for L in vector form just be [(8-7r)/3]i + [(5r-1)/3]j + rk?

Vector b is parallel to that if you just add a constant, correct?

No. any vector parallel to another is a multiple. What you have calculated is a vector function. Since the problem asks for a vector parallel, pick two values for r, calculate the corresponding points on the line and subtract to find the vector. Taking r= 0 and r= 1 should make it very easy!

c) (The tricky one).
Write down normal vectors n1, n2, n3 for the planes P1, P2, P3 respectively. Obtain a vector c that lies along the line of intersection of P1 and P2, by using the vectors n1 and n2.

Is c parallel to the vector b in (b) above? Should it be?

Yes, any vectors "along" the same line will be parallel. Any vector perpendicular to the normal to P1 must lie in P1. Any vector perpendicular to the normal to P2 must lie in P2. The crossproduct of those two normal vectors will be perpendicular to both, therefore lie in both planes, therefore along the line of intersection. Frankly, I don't understand your tutor's suggestion at all! Since the problem asks for a vector, not a vector function, there shouldn't be any variable involved.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top