Please HELP Don't Understand Simple Concept on Riemann Sums

BuBbLeS01
Messages
602
Reaction score
0
Please HELP...Don't Understand Simple Concept on Riemann Sums

Can someone please explain this to me...

The number of subintervals in a partition approaches infinity as the norm of the partition approaches 0. That is, ||Triangle|| approaches 0 implies that n approaches infinity.

I thought the the norm (||Triangle||) was just the largest subinterval of a partition, so how does it approach 0??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is because we make the intervals smaller and smaller (going to zero), which means we have to make the number of intervals go to infinity to cover the entire domain (that is, ||Triangle|| * #{Triangles} = constant). Let me give an example.

Suppose we have a function, f(x) = x^2 on the interval [0, 1] and we want to integrate it. At first, we approximate it by a square of width 1 and height f(1) = 1, which gives 1. This is of course very rough, so we divide the square into two. One rectangle goes from 0 to 1/2 with height f(1/2) = 1/4, and the other one from 1/2 to 1 with height 1. This gives for the area (1/2) * (1/4) + (1/2) * 1 = 1/8 + 1/2 = 5/8.
Now divide it into four parts, all rectangles with width 1/4 and as height the value of the function in the rightmost point of each interval, as in this image. The are will become something like
\sum_{n = 1}^N \frac{1}{N} \times f(n/N),
where the first term is the width of the rectangle and the second term is the height (draw a picture for yourself, I can't do it here).
Now we make N larger and larger, dividing [0, 1] up into more and more intervals. The rectangles get smaller and smaller. The idea is of course that the sum converges to \int_0^1 x^2 \, dx.
You can calculate for yourself, that you get
\frac{1}{N^3} \sum_{n = 1}^N n^2 = \frac{\frac16 N (N + 1) (2 N + 1)}{N^3}
which converges to 2/6 = 1/3 as N goes to infinity, which is indeed the surface under the curve.

I hope that made things clearer, even without pictures. Maybe this will help you visualize it.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top