Please help evaluate this Green's problem.

  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
294

Homework Statement



Evaluate

\int_{\Gamma} x\frac{\partial}{\partial n} G(x,y,\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{3}) ds

On a unit disk region \Omega[/tex] with positive oriented boundary \Gamma<br /> <br /> <h2>Homework Equations</h2><br /> <br /> u(x_0, y_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{\Gamma} ( u\frac{\partial v}{\partial n} - v\frac{\partial u}{\partial n}) ds<br /> <br /> u(x_0, y_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{\Gamma} [ u\frac{\partial }{\partial n} G(x,y,x_0,y_0)] ds<br /> <br /> In this case u= x \Rightarrow \nabla^2 u = 0 which means u is harmonic in \Omega[/tex]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; G=v + h \hbox { where }\; v=\frac{1}{2}ln[(x-x_0)^2 + (y-y_0)^2] = ln|r|&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; h = -v \hbox { on }\; \Gamma \hbox { and h is harmonic in } \Omega&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Since v is not harmonic in \Omega [/tex] because v\rightarrow -\infty \hbox { as } (x,y) \rightarrow (x_0,y_0). This mean G is not harmonic.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;The Attempt at a Solution&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; I have no idea how to approach this and no idea how to find G. Please help.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Thanks&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Alan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone please?
 
I have been reading the books over and over, the problem is the book asked this question without ever showing methods on how to solve the problem.

The two example in the book basically solve the poissons equation with normal ways of separation of variable and then put into the formula of

u(x_0,y_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{\Omega} f(x,y) G(x,y,x_0,y_0) ds

Then just equate Green function G.

But in this case, u(x,y)\;=\; x\;=\; r\; cos(\theta) where u is harmonic function with boundary condition of u(1,\theta)= cos \theta. Solving this Laplace equation with boundary condition will quickly give u(r,\theta) = r cos\theta! Which is going nowhere.

Please help.

Alan
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top