Please help Projectile breaks into fragments question

  • Thread starter Thread starter DunWorry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectile
AI Thread Summary
A projectile of mass 22kg is fired at an angle of 55 degrees with a speed of 350 m/s and explodes into two equal fragments at its highest point. The first fragment lands 5867m away, while the second lands 17600m from the cannon. The discussion revolves around calculating the energy released during the explosion, with participants considering the conservation of kinetic energy before and after the explosion. It is noted that potential energy can be ignored since both fragments start from the same height, focusing instead on the change in kinetic energy. The mass of each fragment is confirmed to be 10kg, and the correct energy relationship is established as KE_before = KE_after + KE_explosion.
DunWorry
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A projectile of mass 22kg is fired at an angle of 55 degrees to horizontal with a speed of 350ms-1. At the highest point of trajectory the projectile explodes into two equal fragments, one lands directly beneath the explosion and the other flies off.

I have done the parts of the question, worked out the first piece lands 5867m and the second piece lands 17600m from the cannon. I have also worked out the speeds of each fragment at the moment of the explosion

The last part says what is the energy released in the explosion?

I can't formulate it in my head, I can only think of KE_{initial} + Potential energy _{explosion}= GPE_{max height} + KE_{left over} (because its still moving in x direction at max height)+ KE_{explosion}


I'm not sure of how I am going to find this energy.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you need to worry about the PE? How about looking only at the KE just before and just after after the explosion...

KEafter = KEbefore + KEexplosion

Edit: Humm. I'm having second thoughts about that. Do you know the mass of each bit after the explosion?
 
CWatters said:
Do you need to worry about the PE? How about looking only at the KE just before and just after after the explosion...

KEafter = KEbefore + KEexplosion

Edit: Humm. I'm having second thoughts about that. Do you know the mass of each bit after the explosion?

no no wait it gives the right answer if I do KE_{before} = KE_{AFTER} + KE _{explosion}

but how did you think of this? why can I ignore potential energy?

also the mass of each piece is 10kg as it breaks into equal fragments.
 
DunWorry said:
no no wait it gives the right answer if I do KE_{before} = KE_{AFTER} + KE _{explosion}

but how did you think of this? why can I ignore potential energy?

also the mass of each piece is 10kg as it breaks into equal fragments.

The change in gravitational potential energy is the same, but the change in kinetic energy gives us the work done by the projectile, which is what we are interested in.
 
DunWorry said:
no no wait it gives the right answer if I do KE_{before} = KE_{AFTER} + KE _{explosion}

but how did you think of this? why can I ignore potential energy?

also the mass of each piece is 10kg as it breaks into equal fragments.

Immediately after the explosion, what is the potential energy?
 
DunWorry said:
but how did you think of this? why can I ignore potential energy?

What sammy said. Just after the explosion the two bits of shell have different velocity but they start from the same height as the shell.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top