Please help with an exercise in mathematical methods for physicists

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equation of motion for a charged particle under Coulombic attraction in three-dimensional space. The original poster has successfully solved the problem in polar coordinates but seeks guidance for a three-dimensional solution. Participants suggest using spherical coordinates and applying Lagrangian mechanics to formulate the equations of motion. They emphasize that the particle's motion can be confined to a plane due to the conservation of angular momentum, which arises from the central force nature of the problem. The transformation from a planar solution to three-dimensional coordinates can be achieved using the established equations of motion.
benjamin198
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Derive the equation of motion of a particle of mass m and charge q moving in three dimensional space under a Coulombic attraction toward a fixed center.

I have the answer for a plane but a i need it for the space
1%2B.jpg

Homework Equations


2.jpg

Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (Donald A. mcquarrie), chapter 20,.

The Attempt at a Solution



I did the exercise in polar coordinates
IMAG0415.jpg


IMAG0416.jpg

Homework Statement

 
Physics news on Phys.org
The OP shows thumbnails of images, but you can't open the images themselves. We can't see the problem statement or your work.
 
in this link looks better
http://htmlimg4.scribdassets.com/6vgsfinm2o2p92ha/images/4-e24c6fe708.jpg
http://htmlimg3.scribdassets.com/6vgsfinm2o2p92ha/images/5-d4de0e56dc.jpg
 
You should use spherical coordinates. You don't have any constraints, so, just write the Langrangian, and apply Lagrange equations.

##L=T-V\\ x=r\sin \phi \cos\theta \\ y=r\sin \phi \sin \theta \\ z=r\cos \phi##
## T=\frac{1}{2}m \left[ \dot {x}^2 + \dot {y}^2+\dot {z}^2 \right]=\frac{1}{2}m \left[ \dot r^2 +r^2\sin^2 \phi\dot \theta^2+r^2\dot \phi^2 \right]##, ##V=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r} ##

You'll have three equations, one for each of the generalized coordinates ##r,\theta,\phi##.

For example, r:

##\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot r}\right)-\frac{\partial L}{\partial r}=0 \\ \therefore m\ddot r-mr(\dot \phi^2+\sin^2\phi\dot\theta^2)+\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r^2}=0##

(I didn't check if what I did is right, you should do it).
 
Last edited:
A charged particle moving a coulombic potential in space does move in a plane. The plane is defined by the center of attraction and the vectors corresponding to the initial displacement of the charge and the initial velocity of the charge. You don't have to resolve the dynamical problem. You just have to figure out how to transform the planar solution into 3d coordinates.
 
Yes, that's because of the conservation of angular momentum, that you can derive from the equations of motion from the Lagrangian I gave (if it was set right, of course). As the force is central, there are no external torques, so the angular momentum is conserved. If you set an initial speed and an initial position, you can get from the vector product the direction on which the angular momentum goes, and define the plane of movement from it. So, it can actually be properly done on cylindrical coordinates instead of polar coordinates, but you can also derive all this from the equations of motions in spherical coordinates.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top