PLease HELP with this trigonometric equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the trigonometric equation tan(10xπ) = -10πx, which is believed to have infinite solutions within the interval x ∈ [-1, 2]. The author of the book suggests specific solutions in the form of xi = (2i-1)/20 + Ei for positive integers and xi = (2i+1)/20 + Ei for negative integers. There is confusion regarding how these particular values of xi are derived, especially since the equation is not defined for all real numbers. Participants express uncertainty about the infinite nature of solutions and seek clarification on the derivation of these values. The conversation highlights the complexities of trigonometric equations and the need for a deeper understanding of their solutions within specified domains.
joanmanuelbl
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Greetings my friends:
I have been reading a book about optimization and I found the following trigonometric equation:
tan(10x.pi)= - 10 pi x (this equation goes from x E [-1,2]
it is easy to see that has infinite solutions, but the author came to the conclusion that the solutions are:
xi=(2i-1)/20+Ei, for i=1,2,...

x0=0

xi=(2i+1)/20+Ei, for i=-1,-2,...


HOw does he get those probable solutions, please I really need to know...

Thank you so much
JoanManuel
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physicsforums.com!

I may just be sleepy, but I can't see why its so obvious that there are an infinite number of solutions...let u=-10 pi x.

we want solutions to tan(-u)=u, or -tan (u)=u. Since u=-10 pi x, and x E [-1,2], u E [-20pi, 10 pi]. It would have an infinite number of solutions if u E all R, but that is not the case.
 
thank for the reply but I still have doubts

Thank you for the reply, I will put the equation in a better wayat I do not know from where the author obtains the values of xi?
why is it 2i-1/20 or the other way?
Please help me
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top