Plotting x vs 2*x is it possible? (Reaction kinetics)

  • Thread starter Thread starter christian0710
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinetics Plotting
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the relationship between concentration plots in reaction kinetics. It highlights that plotting the concentration of A against a constant times the concentration of A results in a straight line, where the constant represents the slope. The conversation explores the concept of plotting variables, such as 2x against x, to deduce that the slope would be 2, reinforcing the idea that the slope reflects the ratio of the two plotted values. The importance of foundational knowledge in kinetics is emphasized, with a suggestion to study further to grasp the concepts more thoroughly. Overall, the exchange illustrates the basic principles of graphing linear relationships in the context of reaction kinetics and the necessity of a solid understanding of the subject for deeper engagement.
christian0710
Messages
407
Reaction score
8
Hi,

I red in reaction kinetics that if you plot the concentration of A againts "some constant times the concentration of A", the constant will be the slope of a straight line (check out the photo i attached). This threw me a bit off, so let me just make sure i understand this:
So i assume it's possible to plot x vs x? and so if you plot let's say 2x vs x you can deduce that the slope of the line must be 2, because as you go one x in one direction you go 2x in the other direction? kif that how simple it is?
 

Attachments

  • plottign graph.jpg
    plottign graph.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 524
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Ahh now i see it, of course, if you plot a graph y=1*x it's like plotting x vs x because y=x and the slope will be one, so if you were trying to derive some constant (in reaction kinetics it's the rate constant) it would be equal to one in this case :)
 
christian0710 said:
Hi,

I red in reaction kinetics that if you plot the concentration of A againts "some constant times the concentration of A", the constant will be the slope of a straight line (check out the photo i attached). This threw me a bit off, so let me just make sure i understand this:
So i assume it's possible to plot x vs x? and so if you plot let's say 2x vs x you can deduce that the slope of the line must be 2, because as you go one x in one direction you go 2x in the other direction? kif that how simple it is?

christian0710 said:
Ahh now i see it, of course, if you plot a graph y=1*x it's like plotting x vs x because y=x and the slope will be one, so if you were trying to derive some constant (in reaction kinetics it's the rate constant) it would be equal to one in this case :)

Sorry but show you have not even the first idea of kinetics, and we can't engage with you till you have studied at least something of it.

You have maybe worked out yourself that plotting x or 2x against x gives you straight lines but you need a book that takes you beyond that starting insight - any book for later years of high school math.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top