Plug the Closed Ends of a Pipe at Depth and Bring it to the Surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of recovering a cut section of pipeline from a depth of 100 meters while ensuring the integrity of temporary plugs at both ends. It highlights that while the pressure inside the sealed pipe is equalized at depth, the dissolved gases in the water can create complications as the section is brought to the surface. As the pressure decreases, these gases may come out of solution, potentially increasing internal pressure beyond safe limits. A proposed solution is to introduce a large air bubble at 9 bar before sealing the pipe, which would help maintain internal pressure and prevent structural failure during ascent. The conversation concludes with considerations of thermal expansion and the importance of comparing the expansion rates of water and pipe material.
Guest_Alpha0
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Hi Guys - I have very simple question but I cannot get my head around.

Say if we cut pipeline into one section (12m) then close each cut end with temporary plugs
Water depth is 100m. Before the cut there is seawater inside the pipeline.
Now I understand there is no differentiated pressure between inside and outside of the cut section (pressure equalized).
Supposed we recover that cut section (plugged both ends) to surface. The outside pressure will be at 1 atm. Therefore the plugs have to be able to withstand at least 9 bar to avoid popping/bursting out by pressure inside.

Do I understand it correctly?

Appreciate your input here.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
Guest_Alpha0 said:
Do I understand it correctly?
Reality is not quite that simple.
In theory, you can treat the water as being incompressible, so it's volume will not change when it comes to the surface in the sealed pipe. But the gas dissolved in the water is different. As the pressure is reduced it will come out of solution and so will apply pressure to the plugs. That is what happens to dissolved gas in the bloodstream of divers as they come to the surface.

If the plugs are able to withstand the pressure difference, the pressure inside the pipe will not be relieved and the gas will not come out of solution, well, not until the pipe begins to warm. As the internal water warms, the gas will come out of solution and the pressure will increase beyond the 9 bar, until something fails.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Guest_Alpha0 and berkeman
Guest_Alpha0 said:
Do I understand it correctly?
Part yes. The pressure actually won't be that high. Within the usual range of 'pipe' and 'plug' the pressure will cause slight mechanical deformation, and that's just enough to lower the pressure.
I would dare not give an estimate, though.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and Guest_Alpha0
Guys - Thanks a lot for the responses. I think I got an idea to work around the problem.
Thank you!
 
Consider putting a large bubble or pocket of air in the pipe at 9 bar before it is sealed. The pipe will then have no stress in the walls. As you bring the pipe to the surface the external hydrostatic pressure is reduced by 9 bar. The internal pressure remains at 9 bar, so the pipe is going to expand in diameter and lengthen slightly as it surfaces with the increasing differential pressure causing tension in the wall. The internal air bubble will largely maintain the internal pressure as the pipe increases slightly in volume. The amount the pipe expands due to differential pressure will also be a function of wall thickness, thin walled pipe will change more.

If there is no big air bubble in the pipe, then once on the surface where the pipe and water warm up, I expect that the water will expand faster and force out the end plugs, or split the pipe longitudinally. You would need to compare the thermal expansion of the water volume with the thermal expansion of the pipe material. An internal air bubble would prevent that expansion failure due to warming.
 
  • Like
Likes Guest_Alpha0
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top