Pogo Stick and Spring Constants

  • Thread starter Thread starter techninja
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants Spring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a child's pogo stick and the mechanics of spring energy, gravitational potential energy, and kinetic energy. The problem explores various aspects of energy conservation and motion dynamics as the pogo stick moves through different positions during a jump.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of total energy in the system, the determination of positions where kinetic energy is maximized, and the relationship between potential and kinetic energy. There are attempts to derive expressions for energy and speed at different points, with some participants expressing confusion over the implications of forces and energy types.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between kinetic and potential energy, suggesting that maximum kinetic energy occurs when potential energy is minimized. Others are exploring the implications of forces acting on the system and how to represent them in a free-body diagram. There is an ongoing exchange of ideas, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of energy conservation in a dynamic system, questioning assumptions about forces and energy types. The discussion reflects the constraints of the problem as participants attempt to reconcile their calculations with physical principles.

techninja
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/75/43802nv4.jpg

A child's pogo stick (see figure) stores energy in a spring of spring constant k = 40000 N/m. At position A, x1 = -0.150 m, the spring compression is a maximum and the child is momentarily at rest. At position B, the spring is relaxed and the child is moving upward. At position C, the child is again momentarily at rest at the top of the jump. Assuming that the combined mass of child and pogo stick is 26.0 kg, answer the following:

(a) Calculate the total energy of the system if both potential energies are zero at x = 0

I did this through:
<br /> ME_i = U_s + U_g = \frac{1}{2}kx^2+mgh = 411.78 J<br />

(b) Determine x2

I did this through:
<br /> ME_i = ME_f = U_g<br /> ME_i = mgh
<br /> x_2 = \frac{ME_i}{mg} = 1.62 m<br />

(c) Calculate the speed of the child at x = 0

I did this through:
<br /> ME_i = \frac{1}{2}mv^2<br /> v = \sqrt{\frac{2ME_i}{m}} = 5.63 m/s<br />

(d) Determine the value of x for which the kinetic energy of the system is a maximum.
Hint: The kinetic energy (and velocity) is a maximum when the acceleration is zero at that point.

This one, I tried very hard... but I can't do it.

I get:
<br /> v = \sqrt{\frac{2(1378-mgh)}{m}}<br /> a = \frac{1}{m\sqrt{\frac{2h}{m}}}<br />

Tex hates me. It should look something like v = sqrt([2(1378-mgh)]/m), so a = 1/(m*sqrt(2h/m))

Which doesn't seem to work out nicely.

(e) Obtain the child's maximum upward speed

I think I could do this with information from D, but ... I'm not sure.

Any help is muchly appreciated!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
techninja said:
(d) Determine the value of x for which the kinetic energy of the system is a maximum.
Hint: The kinetic energy (and velocity) is a maximum when the acceleration is zero at that point.

This one, I tried very hard... but I can't do it.
This is easier than you think. First realize that as soon as the system passes x = 0, the speed can only decrease. So the max speed must occur before that point. Use your expression for total ME as a function of position and solve for the value of x that maximizes KE. (For KE to be max, PE must be min.)

For an even easier solution, use your own idea that the acceleration must be zero: For the acceleration to be zero, the net force must be zero. Where is that point?
 
Doc Al said:
This is easier than you think. First realize that as soon as the system passes x = 0, the speed can only decrease. So the max speed must occur before that point. Use your expression for total ME as a function of position and solve for the value of x that maximizes KE. (For KE to be max, PE must be min.)

For an even easier solution, use your own idea that the acceleration must be zero: For the acceleration to be zero, the net force must be zero. Where is that point?

I'm not sure what you mean. If I try to find position, I end up with:

<br /> KE = ME_i - mgh

Where ME_i is a constant, as are m and g. Thus, I get a linear equation.

For the latter comment, I'm not sure how the free-body diagram should then be drawn as. There's force of gravity going downwards, but isn't kinetic energy upwards in units of joules? How can I change that?
 
techninja said:
If I try to find position, I end up with:

<br /> KE = ME_i - mgh

Where ME_i is a constant, as are m and g. Thus, I get a linear equation.
Don't forget spring PE, which is also a function of position.

For the latter comment, I'm not sure how the free-body diagram should then be drawn as. There's force of gravity going downwards, but isn't kinetic energy upwards in units of joules? How can I change that?
(1) KE is not a force. And energy is a scalar, not a vector--it has no direction. (You probably mean that the velocity is upwards, but that's also irrelevant.)
(2) There are two forces acting on the system. Gravity is one. What's the other?
 
Thank you verily much! It suddenly makes sense! (I was wondering why the spring constant was perfectly related to part d)

I still don't understand the second approach, however. Is it possible to find the other force? (Which I assume is just... force imparted upwards?)
 
techninja said:
I still don't understand the second approach, however. Is it possible to find the other force?
Of course it is. What is exerting the upward force on the system? (Hint: It's the same thing you missed with the first approach!)

Note: The two approaches are just different ways of doing the same thing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K