Point charge at the center af a cube

AI Thread Summary
A 10 nC point charge is placed at the center of a 2.0m cube, prompting a discussion on calculating the electric flux through the top surface. Gauss's Law indicates that the total electric flux through a closed surface is proportional to the enclosed charge, but the top surface alone does not constitute a closed surface. To find the flux through just the top, the total flux through the entire cube must be calculated first and then divided by six, due to the cube's symmetry. The correct approach yields a flux of approximately 0.19 kN m²/C for the top surface. Understanding the application of Gauss's Law is crucial for solving such problems accurately.
Mandaz
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A 10 nC point charge is at the center of a 2.0m x 2.0m x 2.0 m cube. What is the electric flux through the top surface of the cube?

related equations:

gauss's law -- Qin/e0

e0 = 8.85 x 10 ^-12 C^2/Nm^2

my attempt:

10 x 10^-9 C
________________________ = 1129.94 C/Nm^2
8.85 x 10 ^-12 C^2/Nm^2

the real answer:

10 x 10^-9 C
________________________ = .19 kN m^2/C
6 x (8.85 x 10 ^-12 C^2/Nm^2)

i do get what they did! Can anyone help me out?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Notice they ask about the flux through the top of the cube, not the whole cube. Gauss's Law applies to the flux through a closed surface enclosing a charge. Just the top of the cube is not a closed surface.

Think about the symmetry of the problem, though.
 
i multiply by 1/6 because they only want one side of the cube, is that right.

i do not get what you mean by it will no longer be considered a closed surface because they only want one side.
 
Mandaz said:
i multiply by 1/6 because they only want one side of the cube, is that right.

i do not get what you mean by it will no longer be considered a closed surface because they only want one side.

That is right.

What I meant was that the top of the cube alone is not a closed surface, it does not enclose the charge (or anything) by itself. Because of that, Gauss's law does not apply to the top surface alone. You apply Gauss's law to the cube as a whole, and by symmetry the flux out of each side is equal, and so must be 1/6th the total.
 
okay that makes a lot more sense now! thank you very much for all your help
 
Last edited:
Because there are total 6 surfaces in a cube so that multiply by 6.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top