Point charges and static equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
For the three-point charge system to be in static equilibrium, the net electric field must equal zero, meaning the individual electric fields from the charges must cancel each other out. The third charge is proposed to be -5q based on the total charge of the first two, but this approach neglects the importance of distance in the electric field calculations. It is essential to consider the distances between the charges, as the electric field strength is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. To solve for the magnitude and sign of the third charge, it is recommended to assign a variable for the distance from the third charge to the first charge and use simultaneous equations involving the two other charges. Understanding the relationship between the distances and charges is crucial for finding the correct answer.
elecstorm
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two point charges q and 4q are distance L apart and free to move. A third charge is placed so that the entire three-charge system is in static equilibrium.

Homework Equations



\SigmaF=0 This is the equation for static equilibrium
\vec{E}=q/4\pi\epsilon_{0}r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



If the three point charges are in static equilibrium, the net electric field is zero. So, \vec{E}=0, which means that the individual electric fields of the point charges must add up to zero. Thus, the third charge must be -5q, as q + 4q = 5q.

Is any of this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. There is a r^2 in the denominator. What happened to that? You have to take distance into consideration.
 
Don't forget that the force on each of the three particles must be zero. Due to symmetries, and the fact that you need to find two quantities (charge and distance) you actually only need to consider any two particles, so that you get two simultaneous equations.
 
Sorry, forgot to include the actual question. The question asks for the magnitude and sign of the third charge. I don't really understand the wording of this question. That is, should I assign another variable for the distance from the third charge? As well, is the magnitude of the third charge related to q, I don't think it is, because it does not ask for inclusion of the q variable in the answer...but I don't know how to calculate it otherwise. Thank you!
 
Yes, take the dist of the 3rd charge from the 1st as x and then the dist q3-q2 will be L-x, if q3 is in between them.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top