Polarisation of Light: Understanding Polaroid Sheets and Intensity Measurements

ku1005
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Unpolarised light is shone onto a set of three transmission Polaroid sheets. The intensity of light after the first Polaroid sheet is measured to be I = E2. The transmission axis of the second and third Polaroid sheets are at angles of alpha and beta with respect to the transmission axis of the first Polaroid sheet. The amplitude of light emerging from the set of Polaroid sheets is:


Homework Equations



Intensity = I (MAX) * (cos(theta))^2

The Attempt at a Solution


My workings follow :

http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/8982/polaroidphysicsqbq3.png

Why, is the answer then :
http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/334/answertoplroidti7.png

which part of my workings are incorrect/show lack of understanding??

(see above)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
just thinking now, it because the amplitude of light is unaffected by the intensity of the light, and therefore, throughout the 3 polaroids, the amplitude of the light will simply change via:

E-> first

Ecos(alpha) through second

Ecos(alpha)cos(beta-alpha) through third

We only need the component of Amplitude transmitted, not the intensity, the intensity bit is a distraction/trap

is this correct thinking?
 
It is correct thinking.
 
You had it right the first time.

You forgot that the question is asking for the final amplitude. This can be deduced from the final intensity because:

I=E^2

So all you needed after your third equation was to take the square root.

Amplitude is a vector and is can be thought of as a wave; thus it requires an imaginary phase.

Intensity is the square of amplitude and can be measured and thus has no imaginary parts. It is not a wave.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top