Polarization and intensity with three polarizing sheets

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating light intensity through three polarizing sheets using the correct angles and formulas. The initial intensity of unpolarized light is halved when passing through the first sheet, leading to I1 = 0.5 I0. The user initially misapplied the angles for the subsequent sheets, but corrections were made to use the angles relative to the axes of the sheets. The correct approach involves determining the angles between the sheets and applying the formula I = I0*cos²(θ) accurately. Ultimately, the user is guided to find the final intensity ratio and percentage of light intensity after passing through all sheets.
VitaX
Messages
183
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/7899/physicsch3333.png

Homework Equations



I = 0.5*I_0
I = I_0*cos^2(θ)

The Attempt at a Solution



I_1 = 0.5*I_0*(cos 50)^2
I_2 = I_1*(cos 70)^2
I_3 = I2*(cos 50)^2

This is my attempt at the problem. This is new to me and I know that I use I = 0.5*I_0 for unpolarized light, but this one had an angle so I wasn't sure how to implement it in. I'm assuming my I_1 is wrong, what's the correct notation for it? And I used the angles relative to the x axis, should I not do that and use the given angles?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is new to me and I know that I use I = 0.5*I_0 for unpolarized light, but this one had an angle so I wasn't sure how to implement it in.

Your I1 is indeed wrong. The light is initially unpolarized, which means it doesn't point in any direction in particular. So the angle of the first sheet doesn't matter. We just have,

I1 = 0.5 I0

And I used the angles relative to the x axis, should I not do that and use the given angles?

You do need to fix your angles. The equation you posted is correct, but you didn't implement it correctly. We have,

I = I0*cos2(θ)

Any angle is defined as the angle between something and something else. What two things is θ between in this case?
 
Mike Pemulis said:
Your I1 is indeed wrong. The light is initially unpolarized, which means it doesn't point in any direction in particular. So the angle of the first sheet doesn't matter. We just have,

I1 = 0.5 I0



You do need to fix your angles. The equation you posted is correct, but you didn't implement it correctly. We have,



Any angle is defined as the angle between something and something else. What two things is θ between in this case?

So it will be:
I1 = 0.5 I0
I2 = I1cos^2(20)
I3 = I2cos^2(40)

Then it's just:
I3 = I2cos^2(40) = (I1cos^2(20))cos^2(40) = 0.5 I0cos^(20)cos^2(40)

And whatever constant I get multiplied by I0. Then find the ratio of I3/I0 and that's my percentage of light intensity? Are my angles right this time around?
 
I2 = I1cos2(20)
I3 = I2cos2(40)

No -- the given angles are not exactly the angles you plug into the formula. You need to figure out what to do with them. One hint -- say the axis of Sheet 2 pointed in the same direction as the axis of Sheet 1. What would happen to the intensity as the light passed through Sheet 2?
 
Mike Pemulis said:
No -- the given angles are not exactly the angles you plug into the formula. You need to figure out what to do with them. One hint -- say the axis of Sheet 2 pointed in the same direction as the axis of Sheet 1. What would happen to the intensity as the light passed through Sheet 2?

So you're telling me to use something like this:

3e8ER.png


Where I take the sum of the angles 40 and 20 and then my angles for I2 and I3 will be 60 degrees? I guess I could find the angle between the two, which would be 120 as well, since we are squaring them, the negative will go away anyways.
 
Last edited:
Exactly right. I have nothing to add -- nice job. :smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top