% polarization of partially polarized light

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the percent polarization P of partially polarized light using the formula P = [Imax - Imin]/[Imax + Imin] x 100. Participants explore how to derive the intensity of light transmitted through a polarizer at an angle theta to Imax, leading to the equation [1 + pcos(2theta)]/[1 + p], where p = P/100. There is confusion about the expected maximum intensity at theta=0 degrees and the relationship between p and cos^2(theta). Contributors suggest breaking down the problem by considering the contributions from two orthogonal sources and combining their intensity distributions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the equations for intensity to solve the problem effectively.
ken~flo
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1. Here's the question:

The percent polarization P of a partially polarized beam of light is defined as

P = [Imax - Imin]/[Imax + Imin] x 100

where Imax and Imin are the max and min intensities that are obtained when the light
passes through a polarizer that is slowly rotated. Such light can be considered as the
sum of two unequal plane-polarized beams of intensities Imax and Imin perpindicular to
each other. Show that the light transmitted by a polarizer, whose axis makes an angle
theta to the direction in which Imax is obtained, has intensity

[1 + pcos(2theta)]/[1 + p]

where p = P/100.

Homework Equations



I = I# x cos^2(theta) (I# is I naught, or initial intensity)

3. I thought that the intensity would be at a maximum when theta=0 degrees, because
cosine of 0 is 1, so the Intensity of the polarized light would be equal to the intensity
of the light initially, but that doesn't seem to work out to something that resembles
the answer. I also thought that maybe p=cos^2(theta), since it is the fractional
percentage of the initial intensity. I also tried coming up with equations for Imax and
Imin, but I wasn't sure whether or not they would have the same angles and
intensities. Any help with this problem would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that you should add the two contributions for the two orthogonal "sources". So write one equation for the intensity distribution of one source, and another for the intensity distribution of the orthogonal source, and then add them, under the constraint of the top equation for the percent variation between the two sources...

Show us some of those equations, and I think you will be mostly there...
 
okay, so here's what I have so far

I (as a function of theta) = Imaxcos^2theta
Imaxcos^2theta = Imax + Imin
Imax(cos^2theta-1) = Imin
Imax(cos2theta) = Imin

am I on the right path?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top