% polarization of partially polarized light

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the percent polarization P of partially polarized light using the formula P = [Imax - Imin]/[Imax + Imin] x 100. Participants explore how to derive the intensity of light transmitted through a polarizer at an angle theta to Imax, leading to the equation [1 + pcos(2theta)]/[1 + p], where p = P/100. There is confusion about the expected maximum intensity at theta=0 degrees and the relationship between p and cos^2(theta). Contributors suggest breaking down the problem by considering the contributions from two orthogonal sources and combining their intensity distributions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the equations for intensity to solve the problem effectively.
ken~flo
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1. Here's the question:

The percent polarization P of a partially polarized beam of light is defined as

P = [Imax - Imin]/[Imax + Imin] x 100

where Imax and Imin are the max and min intensities that are obtained when the light
passes through a polarizer that is slowly rotated. Such light can be considered as the
sum of two unequal plane-polarized beams of intensities Imax and Imin perpindicular to
each other. Show that the light transmitted by a polarizer, whose axis makes an angle
theta to the direction in which Imax is obtained, has intensity

[1 + pcos(2theta)]/[1 + p]

where p = P/100.

Homework Equations



I = I# x cos^2(theta) (I# is I naught, or initial intensity)

3. I thought that the intensity would be at a maximum when theta=0 degrees, because
cosine of 0 is 1, so the Intensity of the polarized light would be equal to the intensity
of the light initially, but that doesn't seem to work out to something that resembles
the answer. I also thought that maybe p=cos^2(theta), since it is the fractional
percentage of the initial intensity. I also tried coming up with equations for Imax and
Imin, but I wasn't sure whether or not they would have the same angles and
intensities. Any help with this problem would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that you should add the two contributions for the two orthogonal "sources". So write one equation for the intensity distribution of one source, and another for the intensity distribution of the orthogonal source, and then add them, under the constraint of the top equation for the percent variation between the two sources...

Show us some of those equations, and I think you will be mostly there...
 
okay, so here's what I have so far

I (as a function of theta) = Imaxcos^2theta
Imaxcos^2theta = Imax + Imin
Imax(cos^2theta-1) = Imin
Imax(cos2theta) = Imin

am I on the right path?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top