Polarization of Waves: Solutions & Explanations

Billy246
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1. Info

Basically, I'm having trouble with this question and it's constituent parts.

http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/6986/question8tn5.jpg



Homework Equations



No equations for first two parts, it's the visualising that I'm finding tricky.
Part 3 will require some sort of angular velocity equation, yet I'm still unsure.

The Attempt at a Solution



Question part i) Answered (c) horizontally north-south. This seems the logical answer as it is perpendicular to the wave motion.

Question part ii) Shot in the dark would lead me to answer a.

Question part iii) Got lost in the calculation and cannot be sure of calculated answer. I guessed the answer to be answer c - 58 x 10^9



Any help would be greatly appreciated if any is given. Thank you.

Kind Regards,

Billy
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
(i): When an EM-wave is said to be polarized, the convention is that you are talking about the polarization of the E-field. So in this question, we are told that a plane EM-wave is moving towards right, and the plane of polarization is vertical. So I would say (a).

(ii): The B-field always oscillates in such a way to be orthogonal to the E-field. From (i) I would say (c).

(iii): From the equation for E you see that the magnitude of the wave number k is 260 m^{-1}. Since the wave is traveling in air, we will say the velocity is c. Then we have:

<br /> k=\frac{\omega}{c} \Leftrightarrow \omega = kc.<br />

Thus we get (d).

Have a happy New Year :smile:
 
Niles said:
(i): When an EM-wave is said to be polarized, the convention is that you are talking about the polarization of the E-field. So in this question, we are told that a plane EM-wave is moving towards right, and the plane of polarization is vertical. So I would say (a).

(ii): The B-field always oscillates in such a way to be orthogonal to the E-field. From (i) I would say (c).

(iii): From the equation for E you see that the magnitude of the wave number k is 260 m^{-1}. Since the wave is traveling in air, we will say the velocity is c. Then we have:

<br /> k=\frac{\omega}{c} \Leftrightarrow \omega = kc.<br />

Thus we get (d).

Have a happy New Year :smile:

Thank You Niles,

Much appreciated. Hope the New year treats you well!

Regards,
Billy
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top