Potential difference to acquire momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the momentum of an electron with a wavelength of 0.15 nm and determining the potential difference required to accelerate it from rest to achieve that momentum. The initial calculation incorrectly used a wavelength of 550 nm, which was later corrected. The correct momentum is derived using the de Broglie wavelength formula, leading to a value of 4.42 x 10^-24 kg m/s. The potential difference calculation should not involve the speed of light, as the electron's speed is significantly less than that. Ultimately, the correct potential difference needed is 67 V, emphasizing the importance of using classical mechanics for non-relativistic speeds.
desmond iking
Messages
284
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Electron diffracation experiment show that the wavelength of a electron is 0.15nm. Find the momentum of the electron in the beam. ii) Through what the potential diffrenece should the electron accelerated from rest to acquire this momentum?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


λ= h/p , p=momentum
= (6.63x10^-34) / 550x10^-9
= 4.42x10^-24kgm/s
1/2 mc2
= eV

pc = 2eV
V= pc/2e

= (4.42X10^-24) ( 3x10^8) / (2 x 1.6x10^-19)
= 4143 V

but the ans is 67V ... why i am wrong?[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electron will not be traveling at the speed of light (quite far from it). If it was anywhere close, you would also have to use relativistic expressions. As it is, the speed is relatively low and classical expressions should be fine.
 
The electrons are not moving at the speed of light; they are not photons. Your solution should not involve c.

Classically, the momentum is mv. You should know the value of the mass of the electron. So find v (and check to make sure it's well less that c so that relativity doesn't come into play!).

edit: Ha! Orodruin beat me to it!
 
The wavelength of the electron is not 550 nm. Where did you get that value from?
 
so
nasu said:
The wavelength of the electron is not 550 nm. Where did you get that value from?
sorry it's a typo... it should be 0.15x10^-9
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top