What Is the Potential Energy of a Charge Near an Infinite Sheet and a Long Wire?

wml
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
An infinite sheet of charge that has a surface charge density of 21 nC/m2 lies in the yz plane, passes through the origin and is at a potential of 1.3 kV.
A long wire having a linear charge density of 50 nC/m lies parallel to the y-axis and intersects the x-axis at 3.2m.
The permittivity of a vacuum is 8.85419*10^-12 C2/N.m2

What is the potential energy of a 2.4 nC charge placed at x = 1.5 m in units of J.


can anybody help me..
I don't know how to use the 1.3 kV potential
I used V=(入/ 2Eoл)× Ln(r1/r2) , U=V×q
but I entered the answer, it was wrong
:cry:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
wml said:
An infinite sheet of charge that has a surface charge density of 21 nC/m2 lies in the yz plane, passes through the origin and is at a potential of 1.3 kV.
A long wire having a linear charge density of 50 nC/m lies parallel to the y-axis and intersects the x-axis at 3.2m.
The permittivity of a vacuum is 8.85419*10^-12 C2/N.m2

What is the potential energy of a 2.4 nC charge placed at x = 1.5 m in units of J.


can anybody help me..
I don't know how to use the 1.3 kV potential
I used V=(入/ 2Eoл)× Ln(r1/r2) , U=V×q
but I entered the answer, it was wrong
:cry:
The problem is not stated correctly.
If the infinite sheet has a uniform charge density, and there are other charges present, it can’t be an equipotential.
 
never mind~ I got the right answer~! ^^: finally

Vb-Va=-21n×1.5/2Eo -> Vb=1300-1779.661= -479.661

VB-VA(0)=50n/ (2лEo) × Ln(3.2/1.7) = 568.7519 3.2-1.5=1.7

U=q(Vb+VB) = 2.4n × (568.7519-479.661)=2.13818×10^-7
 
But that answer is wrong because of my first post.
If there is a charged wire and a point charge present, the plane cannot be at a constant potential of 1.3 kV.
Is it stated that that is the potential at the origin or on the whole plane?
Also, watch your sig. figs.
 
well, actually I'm still confused but I entered the answer and it was right >,< I didn't skip any words... what I put on the first post is exactly I have on my paper
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top