Potential Energy & Tippipng Forces

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the potential energy required to tip an object traveling at a constant velocity of 2.16 m/s with a mass of 496 kg. The initial calculations for kinetic energy and potential energy were discussed, with an error identified regarding the omission of gravitational acceleration in the energy balance equation. The corrected formula indicates that the object will tip if its velocity meets or exceeds a specific threshold based on the angle of the ground surface. Additionally, the force required to tip the object can be calculated using the object's mass and the angle derived from its geometry. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the clarification provided on calculating tipping forces based on different object geometries.
glocki35
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I have a problem i am trying to figure out, if an object (scale drawing in attachment) is traveling at a constant velocity of 2.16 m/s, with a mass of 496 Kgs, what is the potential energy required to 'tip' this object over?
Kinetic energy = 1/2 Mass x Velocity^2=1/2x496x2.16^2 which = 1157.07 Joules, all good, however;
Potential Energy= Mass x (sqrts^2+a^2-s)=496x(sqrt6.09^2+0.79^2)-6.09 = 496 x (6.14-6.09) which =25.3 Joules
which means, at this velocity this object will tip if it strikes an object on the ground.
Does this seem correct?
Also, how can i calculate the force required to tip this object over?
I have put scale drawing in as an attachment to help.
I am confused and at a complete standstill.

Any help is greatly appareciated.
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
glocki35: Nice work (almost). Your approach seems like a reasonable approximation, for when the base of your object, traveling along the ground, strikes a hard stop (an obstruction) on the ground, provided we neglect strain energy temporarily stored at the contact site (which I did not want to include, because we would need the mass distribution of the striking body, and the stiffnesses of the two colliding entities at the contact site, not to mention it would be too detailed). You, however, made one minor mistake; you forgot to multiply by gravitational acceleration, g. Therefore, your current energy balance equation should instead be 0.5*m1*v1^2 = m1*g*h, where v1 = impact velocity, h = max[0, (6.09^2 + 0.79^2)^0.5 - (6.09/cos(theta))] m, and theta = downward slope angle of ground surface. Solving the above energy balance equation for v1 gives, v1 = (2*g*h)^0.5. According to this analysis, if the velocity of your object equals or exceeds v1, your object will tip over when it strikes the obstruction.

Therefore, if the ground surface is horizontal, theta = 0 deg, h = 0.051 026 m, and v1 = [2(9.81 m/s^2)(0.051 026 m)]^0.5 = 1.001 m/s. If theta = 5 deg, then h = 0.027 763 m, and v1 = 0.738 m/s. If theta = 7.4 deg, then h = 0 m, and v1 = 0 m/s. In other words, if the ground surface slopes downward 7.4 deg, your object tips over even when its velocity is zero.

The tipping force required to tip the object over would be F = m1*g*tan(7.39 deg - theta), where m1 = object mass, and theta was defined earlier. Note that if F is negative, no additional force, other than gravity, is required to tip the object over.
 
Hi NVN,

that is a great response, I understand where you are coming from, i was going to ask before your second post how i could calculate the force required to tip at an angle, however you have already answered this for me.

Thankyou kindly, I really appreciate this!

I can now move onto the next problem it seems.

Cheers

Glocki35
 
glocki35: To answer your PM question, the 7.39 deg angle in post 2 comes from the given object geometry, shown in your diagram. The angle will be different for different objects. The angle depends on the object geometry. For different objects, determine this angle in a manner similar to the method you used in your post 1 diagram.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top