Potential for two semicircular rods

  • Thread starter Thread starter phantom113
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at point P, located between two semicircular rods with different radii, R1 and R2. The potential is influenced by the charge per unit length, lambda, on the rods. There is a question about whether the electric fields from the two horizontal rods cancel each other out, leading to the conclusion that only the inner rod's field needs to be considered. The proposed formula for the electric field at point P is 2k(lambda)*(1/R1 + 1/R2). The inquiry also includes whether the integral for potential should extend from 0 to R1.
phantom113
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two semicircular rods, one of radius R1 and the other of radius R2 where R2 > R1, are joined by two horizontal, straight rods. The rods carry a charge of lambda coulombs per meter. Calculate the potential at point p at the center of the two semicircles. (P would be the center of the two concentric circles if the rods were full circles)

This configuration looks like a rainbow basically and p is on the ground halfway between each side of the rainbow.


Homework Equations


V= KQ/R
V= E*s

The Attempt at a Solution



If I calculate V using the electric field, does the electric field between the two rods cancel so I would just have to use the electric field due to the inner rod? I know the electric fields of the two horizontal rods cancel.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
OK I suppose my real question is, is the electric field at point P

2k(lambda)*(1/R1 + 1/R2)

And then if that is so, to find the potential does the integral go from 0 to R1?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top