Potentials from continuous distributions.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating electric potential for a spherical shell with a constant charge distribution. The potential at the radius of the shell can be treated as that of a point charge, yielding V = kQ/R. For the center of the shell, the potential is equal to that at the surface due to the shell theorem, which states that the electric field inside the shell is zero. Participants suggest using the integral definition of electric potential, V = -∫E dr, to find the potential by considering different electric fields inside and outside the shell. The final consensus is that the potential at both the surface and center is KQ/R.
scorpion990
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hey... I have a quick question for you guys about electric potential.
I have a spherical shell with a constant charge distribution. The total charge(Q), along with the shell's radius is given. Also, V(infinity) is defined to be 0 in this case.

I'm told to find:
a. The potential at r = the radius of the shell
b. The potential at r =0.
Now, I'm aware that V = kq/r, and I understand where the formula comes from. I'm just having trouble applying it to various situations..

At r = the radius of the shell, I can treat the shell as a point charge, correct? And therefore, V = kQ/r.

Part b confuses me a bit. First of all, there is no charge at the center. Second of all, if I were to "plug and chug" without really thinking too much, I'd be tempted to plug r=0 into: V = kQ/r. Of course, this would give that V = infinity.

IDEA: I just had a thought. My E&M class is definitely calculus-based, but we usually aren't expected to do much more than one-dimensional integrals on exams. Is it possible to calculate potential as:
V=\oint\frac{kq}{r}ds?

kq/r is a constant, and the surface integral with respect to s would just equal the surface area of the original sphere, correct? Anybody mind helping me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V = KQ/r is only applicable for point charges or spherically symmetrical charge distributions (when outside them).

You can use the definition of electric potential as:
V = -\int_{\infty}^{0} E dr

If you can find the electric fields inside and outside the sphere (they're different, so you'll have to split the integral up from infinity to R and R to 0), then this will give you the potential. And apparently it's KQ/R (R = radius of shell).

I think doing the surface integral that way works also... but you need to be careful, because you're not integrating KQ/r through the surface, but some little contribution dQ from each piece of the surface. You need to find a way to relate dQ to the total charge Q.
 
Last edited:
u r right for the first part bt for the second part(according to shell theorem by Newton which applies in this case)the electric field inside the shell is zero and thus the potential at the surface is the potential at the centre
 
awvvu said:
V = KQ/r is only applicable for point charges or spherically symmetrical charge distributions (when outside them).

You can use the definition of electric potential as:
V = -\int_{\infty}^{0} E dr

If you can find the electric fields inside and outside the sphere (they're different, so you'll have to split the integral up from infinity to R and R to 0), then this will give you the potential. And apparently it's KQ/R (R = radius of shell).

I think doing the surface integral that way works also... but you need to be careful, because you're not integrating KQ/r through the surface, but some little contribution dQ from each piece of the surface. You need to find a way to relate dQ to the total charge Q.

Oh... sorry... I wrote that integral incorrectly.I actually integrated with respect to the dq across the sphere, got some nice cancellations, and got KQ/R. =)

Thank you!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top