Potentials from continuous distributions.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating electric potential from a spherical shell with a constant charge distribution. The original poster is tasked with finding the potential at the shell's radius and at its center, while grappling with the application of the formula V = kQ/r and the implications of the shell theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the formula V = kQ/r for the potential at the radius of the shell and questions how to approach the potential at the center, noting the absence of charge there. They also explore the idea of using a surface integral to calculate potential.
  • Some participants clarify that V = kQ/r is valid only for point charges or outside spherically symmetrical distributions and suggest using the definition of electric potential involving electric fields.
  • Others mention the need to consider different electric fields inside and outside the shell and the implications of the shell theorem regarding the electric field being zero inside the shell.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on the application of electric potential concepts and integrals. There is acknowledgment of the need to split the integral for potential calculation and a recognition of the relationship between charge distribution and potential.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's course is calculus-based but typically involves one-dimensional integrals, which may influence their approach to the problem. There is also a mention of the shell theorem, which states that the electric field inside a uniformly charged shell is zero.

scorpion990
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hey... I have a quick question for you guys about electric potential.
I have a spherical shell with a constant charge distribution. The total charge(Q), along with the shell's radius is given. Also, V(infinity) is defined to be 0 in this case.

I'm told to find:
a. The potential at r = the radius of the shell
b. The potential at r =0.
Now, I'm aware that V = kq/r, and I understand where the formula comes from. I'm just having trouble applying it to various situations..

At r = the radius of the shell, I can treat the shell as a point charge, correct? And therefore, V = kQ/r.

Part b confuses me a bit. First of all, there is no charge at the center. Second of all, if I were to "plug and chug" without really thinking too much, I'd be tempted to plug r=0 into: V = kQ/r. Of course, this would give that V = infinity.

IDEA: I just had a thought. My E&M class is definitely calculus-based, but we usually aren't expected to do much more than one-dimensional integrals on exams. Is it possible to calculate potential as:
V=[tex]\oint[/tex][tex]\frac{kq}{r}[/tex]ds?

kq/r is a constant, and the surface integral with respect to s would just equal the surface area of the original sphere, correct? Anybody mind helping me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V = KQ/r is only applicable for point charges or spherically symmetrical charge distributions (when outside them).

You can use the definition of electric potential as:
[tex]V = -\int_{\infty}^{0} E dr[/tex]

If you can find the electric fields inside and outside the sphere (they're different, so you'll have to split the integral up from infinity to R and R to 0), then this will give you the potential. And apparently it's KQ/R (R = radius of shell).

I think doing the surface integral that way works also... but you need to be careful, because you're not integrating KQ/r through the surface, but some little contribution dQ from each piece of the surface. You need to find a way to relate dQ to the total charge Q.
 
Last edited:
u r right for the first part bt for the second part(according to shell theorem by Newton which applies in this case)the electric field inside the shell is zero and thus the potential at the surface is the potential at the centre
 
awvvu said:
V = KQ/r is only applicable for point charges or spherically symmetrical charge distributions (when outside them).

You can use the definition of electric potential as:
[tex]V = -\int_{\infty}^{0} E dr[/tex]

If you can find the electric fields inside and outside the sphere (they're different, so you'll have to split the integral up from infinity to R and R to 0), then this will give you the potential. And apparently it's KQ/R (R = radius of shell).

I think doing the surface integral that way works also... but you need to be careful, because you're not integrating KQ/r through the surface, but some little contribution dQ from each piece of the surface. You need to find a way to relate dQ to the total charge Q.

Oh... sorry... I wrote that integral incorrectly.I actually integrated with respect to the dq across the sphere, got some nice cancellations, and got KQ/R. =)

Thank you!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K