Power of Wavefront Penetrating Dielectric Material

DemoniWaari
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How large proportion of wavefront's power penetrates dielectric material's surface in a perpendicular collision from air. The only parameter that I have is \varepsilon_r = 16 where \varepsilon_r is the relative permittivity.

Homework Equations


\varepsilon = \varepsilon_r \varepsilon_0
\eta = \sqrt{\frac{\mu}{\varepsilon}} Where \mu = \mu_0 Because of the dielectric material.
\vec E(\vec r) = \vec E_0 e^{-j \vec k \cdot \vec r}
\vec H(\vec r) = \frac{1}{\eta} \vec E_{0p} e^{-j \vec k \cdot \vec r} Where \vec E_{0p} is perpendicular to \vec E_0 and has the same magnitude.
\vec S(\vec r) = \frac{1}{2} \vec E(\vec r) \times \vec H(\vec r)^{*} The complex poyinting vector.

The Attempt at a Solution



\vec E_+(\vec r) = \vec E_0 e^{-j \vec k_1 \cdot \vec r} wavefront in the air.
And
\vec E_-(\vec r) = \vec E_0 e^{-j \vec k_2 \cdot \vec r} wavefront in the material
And \eta_1 = \sqrt{\varepsilon_0 \mu_0} is the wave impedance.
Thus we get
\vec H_+(\vec r) = \frac{1}{\eta_1} \vec E_{0p} e^{-j \vec k_1 \cdot \vec r}
And
\vec H_-(\vec r) = \frac{1}{\eta_2} \vec E_{0p} e^{-j \vec k_2 \cdot \vec r}
Now the complex poyinting vectors are
\vec S_+(\vec r) = \frac{1}{2} \vec E_+(\vec r) \times \vec H_+(\vec r)^{*}
We're not interested in the directions so we can just check the magnitudes thus we get.
\vec S_+(\vec r) = \frac{1}{2\eta_1} |E_0|^2
And same thing for the other wavefront...
\vec S_-(\vec r) = \frac{1}{2\eta_2} |E_0|^2

So the passing fraction is
\frac{ \vec S_-(\vec r)}{\vec S_+(\vec r)} =<br /> \frac{\frac{1}{\eta_2}}{\frac{1}{\eta_1}} = \frac{\eta_1}{\eta_2} =<br /> \frac{\sqrt{\frac{\mu_0}{\varepsilon_0}}}<br /> {\sqrt{ \frac{\mu_0}{\varepsilon_r \varepsilon_0} }} = \sqrt{\epsilon_r}=4

So interestingly output is four times higher than input... So I have a problem here =(
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest to use [itex.] rather than [tex.] or the latex will be displayed on a new line for each expression.
When you close the [itex.], use [/itex.] rather than [\itex.]. This is the reason why it doesn't work.
Without the . inside the []'s.
 
OH YES!
Thank you kind sir.
 
Penetrated power = incident power minus reflected power.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top