Power of Wavefront Penetrating Dielectric Material

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the proportion of wavefront power that penetrates a dielectric material's surface during a perpendicular collision from air, specifically with a relative permittivity (\(\varepsilon_r\)) of 16. The derived formula for the passing fraction indicates that the transmitted power is four times greater than the incident power, calculated using the relationship \(\frac{\eta_1}{\eta_2} = \sqrt{\varepsilon_r}\). The complex Poynting vectors for both the air and dielectric material are utilized to derive these results. Additionally, formatting issues with LaTeX expressions in the forum were addressed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave theory
  • Familiarity with dielectric materials and their properties
  • Knowledge of Poynting vector calculations
  • Experience with LaTeX formatting for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Poynting vector in electromagnetic theory
  • Learn about the properties of dielectric materials and their impact on wave propagation
  • Explore advanced topics in wave impedance and transmission coefficients
  • Review LaTeX formatting techniques for mathematical expressions in online forums
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those focused on electromagnetism, wave propagation, and materials science, will benefit from this discussion.

DemoniWaari
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How large proportion of wavefront's power penetrates dielectric material's surface in a perpendicular collision from air. The only parameter that I have is \varepsilon_r = 16 where \varepsilon_r is the relative permittivity.

Homework Equations


\varepsilon = \varepsilon_r \varepsilon_0
\eta = \sqrt{\frac{\mu}{\varepsilon}} Where \mu = \mu_0 Because of the dielectric material.
\vec E(\vec r) = \vec E_0 e^{-j \vec k \cdot \vec r}
\vec H(\vec r) = \frac{1}{\eta} \vec E_{0p} e^{-j \vec k \cdot \vec r} Where \vec E_{0p} is perpendicular to \vec E_0 and has the same magnitude.
\vec S(\vec r) = \frac{1}{2} \vec E(\vec r) \times \vec H(\vec r)^{*} The complex poyinting vector.

The Attempt at a Solution



\vec E_+(\vec r) = \vec E_0 e^{-j \vec k_1 \cdot \vec r} wavefront in the air.
And
\vec E_-(\vec r) = \vec E_0 e^{-j \vec k_2 \cdot \vec r} wavefront in the material
And \eta_1 = \sqrt{\varepsilon_0 \mu_0} is the wave impedance.
Thus we get
\vec H_+(\vec r) = \frac{1}{\eta_1} \vec E_{0p} e^{-j \vec k_1 \cdot \vec r}
And
\vec H_-(\vec r) = \frac{1}{\eta_2} \vec E_{0p} e^{-j \vec k_2 \cdot \vec r}
Now the complex poyinting vectors are
\vec S_+(\vec r) = \frac{1}{2} \vec E_+(\vec r) \times \vec H_+(\vec r)^{*}
We're not interested in the directions so we can just check the magnitudes thus we get.
\vec S_+(\vec r) = \frac{1}{2\eta_1} |E_0|^2
And same thing for the other wavefront...
\vec S_-(\vec r) = \frac{1}{2\eta_2} |E_0|^2

So the passing fraction is
\frac{ \vec S_-(\vec r)}{\vec S_+(\vec r)} =<br /> \frac{\frac{1}{\eta_2}}{\frac{1}{\eta_1}} = \frac{\eta_1}{\eta_2} =<br /> \frac{\sqrt{\frac{\mu_0}{\varepsilon_0}}}<br /> {\sqrt{ \frac{\mu_0}{\varepsilon_r \varepsilon_0} }} = \sqrt{\epsilon_r}=4

So interestingly output is four times higher than input... So I have a problem here =(
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest to use [itex.] rather than [tex.] or the latex will be displayed on a new line for each expression.
When you close the [itex.], use [/itex.] rather than [\itex.]. This is the reason why it doesn't work.
Without the . inside the []'s.
 
OH YES!
Thank you kind sir.
 
Penetrated power = incident power minus reflected power.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K