Power required to move a glass bead in a viscous fluid

rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59

Homework Statement



A bead of radius R(=5 μm) is trapped by an optical beam and moved through a
viscous fluid at a speed vd of 20 μms-1. If the viscous drag is given by Stokes
law:

F_{d}=6\pi \eta Rv_{d}

obtain an expression for the laser power (intensity). If the process only has an efficiency of 25% what laser power
is required to drag the bead?

(Assume that the viscosity of the medium is η=10-3Pa s, and its refractive index, n=1.3)

2. Homework Equations

To keep the particle still, the scattering force from the laser must be equal to the viscous drag from the fluid:

Fs=Fd

The Attempt at a Solution



I can obtain an expression for keeping the particle still, as described in the Relevant equations above. However if we want to move the particle it must (?) involve the gradient force. The force that when the laser is moved will shift the particle towards it's centre, hence the particle will move. But we are not given required info for this derivation, such as the refractive index of the bead.

I'm really lost with this question, has anyone any experience with optics type questions such as these? I've looked online and can't find a similar question anywhere.

Any point in the right direction would really be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rwooduk said:
moved through a
viscous fluid at a speed vd of 20 μms-1.

rwooduk said:
To keep the particle still
"Still?"
rwooduk said:
Fs=Fd
Fdrag(v=0,still) = 0
 
  • Like
Likes rwooduk
Bystander said:
"Still?"

Fdrag(v=0,still) = 0

hm, indeed i misinterpretd the question wrong. In that the laser moves the bead in the fluid, the bead isn't already moving in the fluid. Still, would the drag be due to the gradient force as described in the OP?

thanks for the reply
 
Just to complete this thread I found a very useful derivation that goes some way to solving the problem here (WARNING very large pdf!)

http://www.abhinav.ac.in/DoL/CompEx/Ph_CanadaNPhO_93-02.pdf

Question is found on page 184, solution on page 193
 
rwooduk said:
would the drag be due to the gradient force
rwooduk said:
drag is given by Stokes
law: F d =6πηRv d
You have two forces working, viscous and scattering. Don't get too sidetracked pursuing a "gradient" force until you've defined it.
 
  • Like
Likes rwooduk
Bystander said:
You have two forces working, viscous and scattering. Don't get too sidetracked pursuing a "gradient" force until you've defined it.

Ahhh i see what you are saying, why define the gradient force when it must be equal (slightly greater than) the viscous drag. Will work on this some more, thanks for the replies!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top