Power screw horizontal applicaion FBD

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on setting up a free body diagram (FBD) for a power screw in a horizontal application, contrasting it with typical vertical applications. Participants question the breakdown of the Normal force into components when summing forces and discuss the implications of static versus dynamic conditions on friction and thrust forces. It is clarified that both methods of force analysis are valid, depending on the axis orientation, and that the coefficient of friction differs between static and moving scenarios. The importance of considering motion in the FBD is emphasized, particularly regarding the need for torque and acceleration forces when the screw is in motion. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately modeling the system.
M.E. Tom
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have been trying to set up a free body diagram for a power screw in a horizontal application.
Every example I find they are using a power screw to lift or lower a load not move it left to right.

I have attached the example from the textbook, along with my work so far.

Looking at the textbook example why do they break the Normal force into components when summing forces? In most physics textbooks the Normal force is left intact and other forces, such at weight, are broken down.

Second, on the work2.pdf when I am summing forces for the left traverse condition, I get the Force of friction in the x equal to the negative x component of the normal force. Is this right?

Third, should there be a thrust force causing the nut to move horizontally?
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
M.E. Tom said:
Looking at the textbook example why do they break the Normal force into components when summing forces? In most physics textbooks the Normal force is left intact and other forces, such at weight, are broken down.

Second, on the work2.pdf when I am summing forces for the left traverse condition, I get the Force of friction in the x equal to the negative x component of the normal force. Is this right?

Both methods are valid. It doesn't matter where your axis is located as long as you keep using it throughout the problem. If weight was the only force acting in that example then you would need to use less trig by placing one axis along the inclined plane. That way you wouldn't need to break the normal and friction forces into components.

Your answer is right, but it only works when the screw is not moving. If it was moving you would need set F=ma instead of F=0. Remember that the coefficient of friction is different when it is moving than when it is static.
 
Skrambles said:
Both methods are valid. It doesn't matter where your axis is located as long as you keep using it throughout the problem. If weight was the only force acting in that example then you would need to use less trig by placing one axis along the inclined plane. That way you wouldn't need to break the normal and friction forces into components.

That is what I thought.

Your answer is right, but it only works when the screw is not moving. If it was moving you would need set F=ma instead of F=0. Remember that the coefficient of friction is different when it is moving than when it is static.

Ok, this makes perfect sense. I drew the FBD not thinking about it moving and then confused myself when summing forces.

When it is moving then "P" will have to provide both the Torque and the Acceleration force. How would you draw that resultant force?
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top