Pressure at the center of an accelerating sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the pressure at the center of a glass sphere filled with water and containing a small air bubble, while the sphere accelerates. The initial solution used Pascal's law but was critiqued for not conceptually addressing the forces and pressure differences involved. A more rigorous approach was suggested, incorporating the pressure gradient and buoyancy forces, leading to an equivalent result. The conversation emphasizes that treating gravitational effects as equivalent to acceleration is valid and provides a consistent framework for solving the problem. Ultimately, both methods yield the same pressure calculation at the center of the sphere.
Nathan B

Homework Statement


Consider a glass sphere completely filled with water except for a small air bubble at 1 atmosphere. The sphere is accelerating to the right. What is the pressure at the center of the sphere?
Let Pe = Atmospheric pressure
r = radius of sphere
pw = density of water
a = acceleration of sphere

Homework Equations


I've previously solved this problem successfully with Pascal's law P = Pe + pw*g*h

The Attempt at a Solution


A successful solution was found with the equation P (center of sphere) = Pe + pw * sqrt (g^2 + a^2) r

While this solution rendered the correct answer, my professor told me that summing the acceleration with gravity is not a conceptually correct way of solving this problem, and that it should be solved with forces and pressure differences. Could someone please show me how that might be done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation that you need is the force per unit volume equals minus the pressure gradient: ## \vec{f}_v=-\nabla P ## . You also know (basically F=ma) that ## \vec{f}_v=\delta \,\vec{a}= \delta \, a \, \hat{x} ## where ## \delta ## is the density (kg/m^3) etc. With the small air bubble at 1 atm., I think that puts boundary conditions on the internal pressure at the rightmost glass surface. One other item to consider would be gravity. The gravity equations require that ## -\nabla P -\delta g \hat{z}=0 ##. (static equilibrium from the gravity. The pressure gradient force plus the gravity force per unit volume must add to zero). Perhaps the gravity could be ignored for at least the first calculation of the pressure from the acceleration. Otherwise, you have ## -\nabla P=\delta \, a \, \hat{x}+\delta \, g \, \hat{z} ##. For the gradient operator in the first equation without the gravity, you only need the ## \frac{\partial{P}}{\partial{x}} ## term. ## \\ ## Editing: @Nathan B Your approach in the OP to introduce gravity as well I think simplifies the solution: There is a symmetry in this differential equation if you let ## \vec{u}=\delta \, a \, \hat{x} +\delta \, g \, \hat{z} ## and consider the gradient along the ## \vec{u} ## direction, and integrate ## dP ## back to the center along this line. In fact, doing this gives the exact same answer that you gave in the OP.
 
Last edited:
After working at it for a bit I came up with this solution with forces. Still not with pressure gradients, but it works.

ΣFy = 0
ΣFx = ma
As the buoyant force supplies all force in the x direction, FBx = ma
FB = ma/cos θ = ma/(ma/√((ma)2+FG2)) = √((ma)2+(mg)2) = m√(a2+g2)
Let P = gauge pressure and A = Area
P = m√(a2+g2)/A
m/A = ρh
P = ρh√(a2+g2)
Let Pa = absolute pressure and Po = atmospheric pressure

Pa = Po + ρh√(a2+g2)
Which is the same answer I got originally, just achieved in a somewhat more rigorous manner.
 
It looks good what you even did in the first posting. To do it with gradients, you get ## dP/dr=-\delta \, \sqrt{a^2+g^2} ## where ## r ## is in the ## \vec{u} ## direction, and I'm no longer writing it as a partial derivative. (The ## r ## is now basically the height in the ## \vec{u} ## direction with ## \vec{u}=\delta \, a \, \hat{x}+\delta \, g \, \hat{z} ##). Integrating: ## P(0)=P(R)+\int\limits_{0}^{R} (\frac{dP}{dr}) \, dr=P(R)+\delta \, \sqrt{a^2+g^2} \, R ## which is the same result that you got. In doing these buoyancy problems, it can be helpful to use the pressure gradient form. ## \\ ## Editing: Meanwhile your approach of treating the presence of a gravitational field as equivalent to an upward acceleration of ## g ## is completely accurate and should be seen as a valid solution. Alternatively, an acceleration of ## a ## to the right could be seen as equivalent to a gravitational field with that magnitude pulling to the left. Editing: The only other thing I can think of that he may be looking for is a derivation of the form: ## [P(x)-P(x+\Delta x)]A=\delta \, \Delta x \, A \, a ## which gives ## -\frac{dP}{dx}=\delta \, a ##, which is a simplified form of ## -\nabla P=\delta \, \vec{a} ##.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top