Pressure In a Horizontal Pipe -

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the diameter of a constricted section of a horizontal pipe to reduce pressure from 143 kPa to 101 kPa while water flows at 2.90 L/s. Participants share equations related to fluid dynamics, specifically the conservation of energy equation that relates pressure and velocity in the pipe. Several users express frustration with their calculations, reporting incorrect answers for the diameter and seeking clarification on the necessary assumptions, such as laminar flow and the conversion of flow rates. One user highlights the importance of converting flow rates from liters to cubic meters and calculating velocity based on cross-sectional area. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of the problem and the need for precise calculations to arrive at the correct diameter.
needhelpfast
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Pressure In a Horizontal Pipe - Please Help!

Homework Statement



The pressure in a section of horizontal pipe with a diameter of 2.40 cm is 143 kPa. Water flows through the pipe at 2.90 L/s. If the pressure at a certain point is to be reduced to 101 kPa by constricting a section of the pipe, what should the diameter of the constricted section be?

Homework Equations



I have been using
v1 = IV/A = (2.8 × 10 × 4/π × 4 × 10) =
v2 = v1^2 + 2(P1 − P2)/ρW]1/2
d2 = 2.4(v1/v2)1/2 cm = 1.68 cm

The Attempt at a Solution



See equations above. This problem is making me crazy! Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I have to admit, this one kind of stumped me...but luckily the best internet resource for physics helped, hyperphysics!

I would review this page on hyper physics: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pber.html#bcal"

The equation you need (assuming the 2 pipes are at the same height) is:

P_1+\frac{1}{2} \rho v_1^2 = P_2 + \frac{1}{2} \rho v_2^2

where \rho is the density of the fluid (which you did not give). This is essentially an energy conservation equation. The KEY point in this calculation is that you have to make several simplifying assumptions (read the hyperphysics article) including laminar flow and flow velocity. You find that the kinetic energy term is actually:

\frac{1}{2} \rho \frac{v_{max}^{2}}{3}

Where v_max is given by:

v_{max}=2 v_{effective} = 2 \frac{Flow rate}{Cross-section Area}

You should be able to solve this now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


I'm in the same class and I have the same problem and I don't really understand your explanation.

Using the equation you provided, and setting density to 1000 kg * m^3 (the density to water), velocity should be 9.887 L/S. Then plugging in the values to V1*A1 = V2 * A2 I found what the cross section area should be for the constricted section, and then determined what the diameter should be. That did not give me the answer.

Here's my version of the question: The pressure in a section of horizontal pipe with a diameter of 2.00 cm is 147 kPa. Water flows through the pipe at 2.40 L/s. If the pressure at a certain point is to be reduced to 101 kPa by constricting a section of the pipe, what should the diameter of the constricted section be?

Submission # Try Submitted Answer
1 Incorrect. (Try 1) 3.93 cm
2 Incorrect. (Try 2) 0.005091 m
3 Incorrect. (Try 3) 16.9 cm
4 Submission not graded. Use more digits. 0.0012 cm
5 Incorrect. (Try 4) 0.00118 m
6 Incorrect. (Try 5) 0.00236 m
7 Incorrect. (Try 6) .236 cm
8 Incorrect. (Try 7) 0.985 cm
9 Incorrect. (Try 8) 2.00 cm
10 Submission not graded. Use more digits. 1.9 cm
11 Incorrect. (Try 9) 1.90 cm
12 Incorrect. (Try 10) 1.65 cm
13 Incorrect. (Try 11) 1.66 cm
 


Yeah I was pretty sure it was 1.65 cm, but apparently that's not right! Let me know if you make any progress! I am going to keep trying
 


bump!

also xerxes the link you posted doesn't work
 
Last edited:


I figured it out. You have to convert L to m/s. First convert L to m^3, which is done simply by dividing by 1000. Then divide that by the cross section area (d/2)^2*pi to get the velocity. The rest is then done as before.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=195437 - the thread that helped me out
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top