Pressure to Achieve 10 m/s Flow Into Underwater Reservoir

  • Thread starter Thread starter ACE_99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure
ACE_99
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What pressure Pr, is required to achieve a flow rate of 10 m/s into the underwater reservoir if the tank is 100 m below the surface. Liquid ammonia is to be transferred with a density of 682 kg/m^3 and the pipe diameter is 5 cm. The reservoir underwater is at local hydrostatic pressure. A picture is included.

Homework Equations



Bernoulli's Eqn: P1 + (1/2)\rhoU2 +\rhogz

The Attempt at a Solution


At first I thought that it was as simple as plugging in the values given into the formula and solving for P1, but then I realized that they gave us the diameter of the pipe too so I'm guessing it has some significance. I can't seem to figure it out though, any help would be great.

http://i429.photobucket.com/albums/qq12/ACE_99_photo/Untitled-2.jpg"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Ace. Bernoulli's equation is just one of the necessary equations to calculate this. The other is the irreversible pressure drop of fluid that flows through a pipe which is best done using the Darcy Weisbach equation. You can plug the DW equation into the B equation simply by recognizing that there is a permenant pressure drop under flow equal to the pressure predicted by the DW equation.

Take a look at the DW equation and try to understand how the flow of fluid corresponds to some pressure drop in a pipe.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top