Pressures on fluids of mercury and water

Cosmossos
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Can someone please explain to me why P3-P1=Pb-Pa?
[PLAIN]http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/8123/45074508.jpg
thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


The mercury is not moving. What does that say about the net force acting on the mercury in the horizontal part of the tube? What does that say about the sum of all the pressures at that point?

The force on a section of the mercury in the horizontal part of the tube is due to: gravity and P1 and P3. How is the net gravitational force related to the difference in height of the two columns?

AM
 


The forces are zero.
I know how to claculate Pb-Pa , but I don't know how it is connected with P3-P1 since the heights are different.
 


In looking at this again, Pa-Pb = P3-P1 only if the heights of water above a and b are the same. It depends on the difference in height of water between the right and left sides. Let h1 be the height of water at b and h2 the height of water at a. Pa and Pb are the downward pressures at a and b.

P_b =P_3 + \rho_wgh_1P_a =P_1 + \rho_wgh_2

Subtracting:

P_a - P_b = P_1 - P_3 +\rho_wg(h_2-h_1)AM
 
Last edited:


In the question I have here , it doesn't say anything about h2 and h1. it says that Pb-Pa=P3-P1 thanks to the Communicating_vessels law.But I don't understand why.
 


Cosmossos said:
In the question I have here , it doesn't say anything about h2 and h1. it says that Pb-Pa=P3-P1 thanks to the Communicating_vessels law.But I don't understand why.
The law of communicating vessels is based on P3 and P1 being equal. That is not the case here. You will need to know the height of water above a and b. For example if there was no water above a, Pa=P1. But Pb would not be equal to P3. So Pb-Pa is not equal to P3-P1.

AM
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top