Principle Angles: Am I on the Right Track?

  • Thread starter Thread starter uranium_235
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Principle
AI Thread Summary
Principle angles are defined as the smallest positive coterminal angle of a given angle, sharing the same initial and terminal sides. For an angle of 1000 degrees, the principle angle is 280 degrees, achieved by subtracting 720 degrees. Similarly, for -500 degrees, the principle angle is 220 degrees, obtained by adding 720 degrees. This understanding confirms that the calculations provided are correct. Mastering principle angles is essential for further studies in trigonometry.
uranium_235
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I do not quite get what principle angle angles are. Are they the smallest positive coterminal angle of an angle? Would the principle angles of:
1000 degrees be 280 degrees
-500 degrees be 220 degrees
?
Am I on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Read here ,there's another thread on the same subject.


Daniel.
 


Yes, you are on the right track! Principle angles are indeed the smallest positive coterminal angle of an angle. This means that they have the same initial and terminal sides as the given angle, but they differ by a multiple of 360 degrees. So for 1000 degrees, the principle angle would be 280 degrees because 1000 degrees is equivalent to 280 degrees when you subtract 720 degrees (multiple of 360). And for -500 degrees, the principle angle would be 220 degrees because -500 degrees is equivalent to 220 degrees when you add 720 degrees (multiple of 360). Keep up the good work!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top